Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion for Guidance

被引:60
|
作者
Natarajan, Shyam [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Jones, Tonye A. [1 ]
Priester, Alan M. [2 ,5 ]
Geoghegan, Rory [2 ,5 ]
Lieu, Patricia [1 ]
Delfin, Merdie [1 ]
Felker, Ely [3 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. A. [6 ]
Sisk, Anthony [4 ]
Pantuck, Allan [1 ]
Grundfest, Warren [2 ,5 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Bioengn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Adv Surg & Intervent Technol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2017年 / 198卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; laser therapy; ambulatory surgical procedures; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; BIOPSY; VIVO;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Focal laser ablation is a potential treatment in some men with prostate cancer. Currently focal laser ablation is performed by radiologists in a magnetic resonance imaging unit (in bore). We evaluated the safety and feasibility of performing focal laser ablation in a urology clinic (out of bore) using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion for guidance. Materials and Methods: A total of 11 men with intermediate risk prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective, institutional review board approved pilot study. Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion was used to guide laser fibers transrectally into regions of interest harboring intermediate risk prostate cancer. Thermal probes were inserted for real-time monitoring of intraprostatic temperatures during laser activation. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (3 Tesla) was done immediately after treatment and at 6 months along with comprehensive fusion biopsy. Results: Ten of 11 patients were successfully treated while under local anesthesia. Mean procedure time was 95 minutes (range 71 to 105). Posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging revealed a confined zone of nonperfusion in all 10 men. Mean zone volume was 4.3 cc (range 2.1 to 6.0). No CTCAE grade 3 or greater adverse events developed and no changes were observed in urinary or sexual function. At 6 months magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy of the treatment site showed no cancer in 3 patients, microfocal Gleason 3 + 3 in another 3 and persistent intermediate risk prostate cancer in 4. Conclusions: Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer appears safe and feasible with the patient under local anesthesia in a urology clinic using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion for guidance and thermal probes for monitoring. Further development is necessary to refine out of bore focal laser ablation and additional studies are needed to determine appropriate treatment margins and oncologic efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 846
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion for Guidance EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Ghai, Sangeet
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (04): : 846 - 846
  • [2] OFFICE BASED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED FOCAL CRYOTHERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Patel, Neal A.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Bianco, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E1240 - E1240
  • [3] Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guided focal cryoablation for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Tayebi, Shima
    Blank, Fernando
    Lama, Daniel J.
    Meyer, Meredith
    Saeed, Yusef
    Tobler, Juliana
    Hsu, Wei-Wen
    Verma, Sadhna
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (05) : 158e1 - 158e10
  • [4] Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy - a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis
    Lai, T. C. T.
    Ma, W. K.
    Lam, A. K. C.
    Lam, A. C. S.
    Tsang, C. F.
    Lam, W.
    Ho, B. S. H.
    Ng, A. T. L.
    Tsu, J. H. L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 6 - 6
  • [5] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance
    Tran, Geraldine N.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [6] Focal ablation of prostate cancer: four roles for magnetic resonance imaging guidance
    Sommer, Graham
    Bouley, Donna
    Gill, Harcharan
    Daniel, Bruce
    Pauly, Kim Butts
    Diederich, Chris
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (02) : 6672 - 6681
  • [7] Targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion
    Bockholt, Nathan
    Marks, Leonard S.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (06) : 870 - 873
  • [8] 912 Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in The Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Bhojwani, A.
    Desai, C.
    Ehsanullah, S. A.
    Shahzad, S. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prediction of Final Prostate Pathology
    Le, Jesse D.
    Stephenson, Samuel
    Brugger, Michelle
    Lu, David Y.
    Lieu, Patricia
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05): : 1367 - 1373
  • [10] Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Press, Benjamin
    Lokeshwar, Soum
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Rahman, Syed
    Gardezi, Mursal
    Washington, Samuel
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Leapman, Michael S.
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2023, 7 (06)