Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guided focal cryoablation for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Sidana, Abhinav [1 ,2 ]
Tayebi, Shima [3 ]
Blank, Fernando [1 ]
Lama, Daniel J. [1 ]
Meyer, Meredith [1 ]
Saeed, Yusef [1 ]
Tobler, Juliana [3 ]
Hsu, Wei-Wen [4 ]
Verma, Sadhna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Sect Urol, Med & Biol Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Focal therapy; Cryoablation; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion; Outcomes; Failure; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Focal therapy (FT) is a form of ablative treatment offered to men with localized, organ-confined prostate cancer (CaP). Pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion (MRI-US) guidance enable the precise delivery of FT with limited ablation of adjacent benign tissue or vital genitourinary structures. This article presents our findings on using MRI-US to perform FT as a primary treatment for men with intermediate-risk CaP. Methods: Thirty-six men underwent MRI-US fusion-guided FT cryoablation at a single center from 2018 to 2023 as a primary treatment for intermediate-risk CaP. Following FT, quarterly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and a 6 to 9 month mpMRI and combined MRIUS targeted and systematic biopsy were performed. Oncological outcomes were determined using several endpoints containing biochemical recurrence, imaging failure, and pathological failure. Functional outcomes were measured using reported erectile dysfunction/potency rates, urinary incontinence rates, and the American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men Results: Median follow-up was 29.1 months, most (75%) of whom had grade group 2 CaP. Out of the 36 men, 32 (88.9%) completed the combined MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy follow-up after treatment. The study had no major complications, but 12 (33.3%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade II or lower complications. For oncological outcomes, 6 (16.7%) men had biochemical recurrence, 9 (25%) showed imaging failure, and 8 (22.2%) met the criteria for positive biopsy- out-of-field vs. in-field. 88.2% of previously potent patients remained potent postoperatively at 12 months. All patients were continent at 12 months. There were no statistically significant changes in the AUA-SS and SHIM scores postoperatively. Conclusion: MRI-US-guided cryoablation to target lesions in intermediate-risk CaP appears to be a safe treatment option, with functional outcomes indicating minimal short and intermediate-term morbidity and acceptable oncological outcomes. However, despite close monitoring and follow-up, there is still a limitation in accurately predicting/detecting pathological failure after FT. The long-term durability of FT for intermediate-risk, organ-confined CaP remains uncertain. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158e1 / 158e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pathological Findings in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Biopsy: Relation to Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 105 : 18 - 23
  • [32] Cognitive magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted biopsy combined with randomized biopsy in detection of prostate cancer
    Pang, Cheng
    Wang, Miao
    Hou, Hui-Min
    Liu, Jian-Yong
    Zhang, Zhi-Peng
    Wang, Xuan
    Zhang, Ya-Qun
    Li, Chun-Mei
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Jian-Ye
    Liu, Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (36) : 11183 - 11192
  • [33] Comparative Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Versus In-bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Ramos, Francisco
    Korets, Ruslan
    Fleishman, Aaron
    Kaul, Sumedh
    Johnson, Michael
    Wei, Jesse L.
    Olumi, Aria F.
    Tsai, Leo L.
    Gershman, Boris
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 164 - 171
  • [34] Cognitive magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion transperineal targeted biopsy combined with randomized biopsy in detection of prostate cancer
    Cheng Pang
    Miao Wang
    Hui-Min Hou
    Jian-Yong Liu
    Zhi-Peng Zhang
    Xuan Wang
    Ya-Qun Zhang
    Chun-Mei Li
    Wei Zhang
    Jian-Ye Wang
    Ming Liu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, (36) : 11183 - 11192
  • [35] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review
    Valerio, Massimo
    Donaldson, Ian
    Emberton, Mark
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Mozer, Pierre
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 8 - 19
  • [36] Comparative diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Fang, Jian-hua
    Zhang, Liqing
    Xie, Xi
    Zhao, Pan
    Bao, Lingyun
    Kong, Fanlei
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer.
    Ingham, Matthew
    Mossanen, Matthew
    Wang, Ye
    Chang, Steven Lee
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)
  • [38] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Hsin-Kai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2021, 29 (02) : 75 - 76
  • [39] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Wu, Shulin
    Lin, Sharron X.
    Crotty, Rory K.
    Cornejo, Kristine M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 451.e9 - 451.e14
  • [40] FOCAL CRYOABLATION VS FOCAL HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Ghoreifi, Alireza
    Peretsman, Samuel
    Cummins, Jessica
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Palmer, Suzanne L.
    Aron, Manju
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Bahn, Duke
    Gill, Inderbir
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1043 - E1043