Characteristics of mental skills interventions in dance: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Dwarika, Michelle Schachtler [1 ]
Quinton, Mary L. [1 ]
Nordin-Bates, Sanna [2 ]
Cumming, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Swedish Sch Sport & Hlth Sci GIH, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic Review; MENTAL HEALTH; Protocols & guidelines; TRAINING-PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086345
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Dancers are expected to navigate major challenges in their careers that might take a toll on their physical and mental health. To address underlying factors that might increase dancers' mental and physical health difficulties, research suggests the systematic use of techniques to build mental skills that can reduce risk factors and enhance protective factors against the challenges dancers encounter. However, existing mental skills training interventions in dance present a lack of consistency in design, content and duration, making it difficult to provide evidence-based recommendations. Hence, dance researchers and practitioners would benefit from a mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) of the why, what and how of these interventions. Adopting tools such as the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) can aid this endeavour by describing replicable aspects of interventions, thus offering dance researchers suggestions on how to understand, appraise and report intervention characteristics and processes in dance. Therefore, this protocol outlines a MMSR that will employ TIDieR to identify and assess characteristics of mental skills interventions in dance. Methods and analysis A systematic search will be undertaken in Psycinfo, Medline, Embase, Sportdiscus, Web of Science and the first 30 pages of GoogleScholar. Following the search, two reviewers will independently screen identified studies in Covidence. One reviewer will extract data using the TIDieR framework and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality appraisal, while a second reviewer will check a sample of extracted studies for accuracy. A convergent integrated synthesis will be conducted where quantitative and qualitative evidence will be integrated by qualitising the quantitative data into textual descriptions. Ethics and dissemination There is no requirement for ethical approval for this systematic review as no empirical data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal and presentations in several different forums (eg, a dance psychology network, at scientific and applied conferences).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mental health interventions for suicide prevention among indigenous adolescents: a systematic review protocol
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    Elia, Christelle
    Peixoto, Clayton
    Coelho Jardim, Paulo de Tarso
    Dazzan, Paola
    Veras, Andre Barciela
    Cruickshank, John Kennedy
    Harding, Seeromanie
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [42] Interventions to prevent elder abuse in the community: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Regis de Sousa, Rute Costa
    Nascimento de Araujo-Monteiro, Gleicy Karine
    Souto, Rafaella Queiroga
    dos Santos, Renata Clemente
    Amado Monteiro Leal, Claudia Quezia
    Nascimento, Neyce de Matos
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2021, 55 : 1 - 11
  • [43] Multisectoral interventions for urban health in Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Thondoo, Meelan
    Mogo, Ebele R. I.
    Tatah, Lambed
    Muti, Monica
    van Daalen, Kim R.
    Muzenda, Trish
    Boscott, Rachel
    Uwais, Omar
    Farmer, George
    Yue, Adelaide
    Dalzell, Sarah
    Mukoma, Gudani
    Bhagtani, Divya
    Matina, Sostina
    Dambisya, Philip M.
    Okop, Kufre
    Ebikeme, Charles
    Micklesfield, Lisa
    Oni, Tolu
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [44] Understanding the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of lifestyle modification interventions in adults with learning disabilities: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
    Dikshyanta Rana
    Sophie Westrop
    Evi Germeni
    Arlene McGarty
    Louisa Ells
    Phillippa Lally
    Michael McEwan
    Craig Melville
    Leanne Harris
    Olivia Wu
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [45] Understanding the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of lifestyle modification interventions in adults with learning disabilities: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
    Rana, Dikshyanta
    Westrop, Sophie
    Germeni, Evi
    McGarty, Arlene
    Ells, Louisa
    Lally, Phillippa
    McEwan, Michael
    Melville, Craig
    Harris, Leanne
    Wu, Olivia
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [46] Effect of Square Dance Interventions on Physical and Mental Health among Chinese Older Adults: A Systematic Review
    Ou, Kai-ling
    Wong, Ming Yu Claudia
    Chung, Pak Kwong
    Chui, Kei Yee Katie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (10)
  • [47] Trauma-Informed Approaches in Primary Healthcare and Community Mental Healthcare: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review of Organisational Change Interventions
    Lewis, Natalia V.
    Bierce, Angel
    Feder, Gene S.
    Macleod, John
    Turner, Katrina M.
    Zammit, Stan
    Dawson, Shoba
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2023, 2023
  • [48] Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a protocol for a systematic review of characteristics and methods applied
    Miriam Luhnen
    Barbara Prediger
    Edmund A. M. Neugebauer
    Tim Mathes
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [49] Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a protocol for a systematic review of characteristics and methods applied
    Luhnen, Miriam
    Prediger, Barbara
    Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
    Mathes, Tim
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [50] Assisted bathing of older people with dementia: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
    Konno, Rie
    Kanzaki, Hatsumi
    Stern, Cindy
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (02) : 513 - 520