Characteristics of mental skills interventions in dance: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Dwarika, Michelle Schachtler [1 ]
Quinton, Mary L. [1 ]
Nordin-Bates, Sanna [2 ]
Cumming, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] Swedish Sch Sport & Hlth Sci GIH, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic Review; MENTAL HEALTH; Protocols & guidelines; TRAINING-PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086345
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Dancers are expected to navigate major challenges in their careers that might take a toll on their physical and mental health. To address underlying factors that might increase dancers' mental and physical health difficulties, research suggests the systematic use of techniques to build mental skills that can reduce risk factors and enhance protective factors against the challenges dancers encounter. However, existing mental skills training interventions in dance present a lack of consistency in design, content and duration, making it difficult to provide evidence-based recommendations. Hence, dance researchers and practitioners would benefit from a mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) of the why, what and how of these interventions. Adopting tools such as the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) can aid this endeavour by describing replicable aspects of interventions, thus offering dance researchers suggestions on how to understand, appraise and report intervention characteristics and processes in dance. Therefore, this protocol outlines a MMSR that will employ TIDieR to identify and assess characteristics of mental skills interventions in dance. Methods and analysis A systematic search will be undertaken in Psycinfo, Medline, Embase, Sportdiscus, Web of Science and the first 30 pages of GoogleScholar. Following the search, two reviewers will independently screen identified studies in Covidence. One reviewer will extract data using the TIDieR framework and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality appraisal, while a second reviewer will check a sample of extracted studies for accuracy. A convergent integrated synthesis will be conducted where quantitative and qualitative evidence will be integrated by qualitising the quantitative data into textual descriptions. Ethics and dissemination There is no requirement for ethical approval for this systematic review as no empirical data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal and presentations in several different forums (eg, a dance psychology network, at scientific and applied conferences).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Interventions to Address Incivility in Nursing
    Olsen, Jeanette M.
    Aschenbrenner, Ann
    Merkel, Rachel
    Pehler, Shelley-Rae
    Sargent, Linda
    Sperstad, Rita
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2020, 59 (06) : 319 - +
  • [22] Psychosocial interventions for siblings of children with cancer: A mixed methods systematic review
    Guan, Ting
    Chapman, Mimi V.
    Qan'ir, Yousef
    Song, Lixin
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (06) : 818 - 831
  • [23] Implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with chronic diseases: a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis
    Coumoundouros, Chelsea
    von Essen, Louise
    Sanderman, Robbert
    Woodford, Joanne
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [24] Prevalence and characteristics of mental and physical disorders among female prisoners: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Friestad, Christine
    Haukvik, Unn Kristin
    Johnsen, Berit
    Vatnar, Solveig Karin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH, 2023, 19 (04) : 599 - 627
  • [25] Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
    Kerins, Claire
    McSharry, Jennifer
    Hayes, Catherine
    Perry, Ivan J.
    Geaney, Fiona
    Kelly, Colette
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [26] Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
    Claire Kerins
    Jennifer McSharry
    Catherine Hayes
    Ivan J. Perry
    Fiona Geaney
    Colette Kelly
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [27] The impact of social media interventions on eating behaviours and diet in adolescents and young adults: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
    Tang, Hao
    Spreckley, Marie
    van Sluijs, Esther
    Ahern, Amy L.
    Smith, Andrea D.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [28] Supported employment interventions with people who have severe mental illness: Systematic mixed-methods umbrella review
    Patmisari, Emi
    Huang, Yunong
    Orr, Mark
    Govindasamy, Sumathi
    Hielscher, Emily
    Mclaren, Helen
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [29] Enhancing Mental Skills for Freelance Dance Artists: A Qualitative Study Protocol
    Schachtler Dwarika, Michelle
    Quinton, Mary
    Nordin-Bates, Sanna
    Cumming, Jennifer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2025, 24
  • [30] Mixed Methods Immigrant Mental Health Research in Canada: A Systematic Review
    Farah Islam
    Mark Oremus
    Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2014, 16 : 1284 - 1289