Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years

被引:0
|
作者
Chaudhry, Faran [1 ,2 ]
Daud, Anser [2 ,3 ]
Greenberg, Arieh [2 ,3 ]
Braunstein, Doris [2 ]
Safir, Oleg A. [2 ,3 ]
Gross, Allan E. [2 ,3 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 10期
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular defect; pelvic discontinuity; cup-cage; half cup-cage; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; COMPONENT; RECONSTRUCTION; DISTRACTION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct. Methods: A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction. Results: At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%). Conclusions: The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2555 / 2560
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High placement of noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty - A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report
    Hendricks, Kelly J.
    Harris, William H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (10): : 2231 - 2236
  • [42] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report
    Park, Kyung-Soon
    Seon, Jong-Keun
    Lee, Keun-Bae
    Kim, Sung-Kyu
    Chan, Chee-Ken
    Yoon, Taek-Rim
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (02): : 503 - 509
  • [43] Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty - A concise follow-up, at fifteen to nineteen years, of a previous report
    Della Valle, CJ
    Shuaipaj, T
    Berger, RA
    Rosenberg, AG
    Shott, S
    Jacobs, JJ
    Galante, JO
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08): : 1795 - 1800
  • [44] High Risk of Revision Associated with the L-Cup Titanium Alloy Porous Coated Acetabular Component in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum Follow-Up of 14 Years
    Drobniewski, Marek
    Ruzik, Kacper
    Gonera, Bartosz
    Olewnik, Lukasz
    Borowski, Adam
    Triantafyllou, George
    Borowski, Andrzej
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (04)
  • [45] Acetabular Augments Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-year Follow-Up of Implant Survivorships, Functional Scores, and Radiographic Outcomes
    Braunstein, Doris
    Greenberg, Arieh
    Chaudhry, Faran
    Daud, Anser
    Sa, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (03): : 751 - 757
  • [46] Trabecular Metal Augments for Severe Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up
    Russell, Shane P.
    O'Neill, Cathleen J.
    Fahey, Eoin J.
    Guerin, Shane
    Gul, Rehan
    Harty, James A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (05): : 1740 - 1745
  • [47] Satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach using primary femoral stems at 2-8 years of follow-up
    Viamont-Guerra, Maria-Roxana
    Ramos-Pascual, Sonia
    Saffarini, Mo
    Laude, Frederic
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (10) : 6393 - 6402
  • [48] Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Severe Acetabular Bone Defect after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Metal Mesh
    Yang, Chao
    Zhu, Kechao
    Dai, Huiyong
    Zhang, Xianlong
    Wang, Qiaojie
    Wang, Qi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (03) : 750 - 757
  • [49] Treatment of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a clinical practice review
    Ali, Erden
    Howard, Lisa C.
    Neufeld, Michael E.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2024, 9 : 1 - 12
  • [50] Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4-to 14-Year Follow-Up
    Chen, Hou-Tsung
    Wu, Cheng-Ta
    Huang, Tsan-Wen
    Shih, Hsin-Nung
    Wang, Jun-Wen
    Lee, Mel S.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018