Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years

被引:0
|
作者
Chaudhry, Faran [1 ,2 ]
Daud, Anser [2 ,3 ]
Greenberg, Arieh [2 ,3 ]
Braunstein, Doris [2 ]
Safir, Oleg A. [2 ,3 ]
Gross, Allan E. [2 ,3 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 10期
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular defect; pelvic discontinuity; cup-cage; half cup-cage; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; COMPONENT; RECONSTRUCTION; DISTRACTION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct. Methods: A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction. Results: At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%). Conclusions: The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2555 / 2560
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A 2-to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup
    Stigbrand, Hampus
    Gustafsson, Oscar
    Ullmark, Gosta
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (03): : 815 - 822
  • [22] Total hip arthroplasty with cement and without acetabular bone graft for severe hip dysplasia - A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of a previous report
    Klapach, AS
    Callaghan, JJ
    Miller, KA
    Goetz, DD
    Sullivan, PM
    Pedersen, DR
    Johnston, RC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (02): : 280 - 285
  • [23] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting without cage reinforcement for revision hip replacement A MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY
    Gilbody, J.
    Taylor, C.
    Bartlett, G. E.
    Whitehouse, S. L.
    Hubble, M. J. W.
    Timperley, A. J.
    Howell, J. R.
    Wilson, M. J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (02): : 188 - 194
  • [24] Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up
    Lebeau, N.
    Bayle, M.
    Belhaouane, R.
    Chelli, M.
    Havet, E.
    Brunschweiler, B.
    Mertl, P.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (05) : 679 - 684
  • [25] Acetabular Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Impacted Morselized Allograft and a Cementless Cup Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up
    Lee, Joong-Myung
    Nam, Hee-Tae
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (07): : 1057 - 1060
  • [26] Reconstruction of Severe Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty Management options and clinical outcomes
    Mogos, Stefan
    Viscopoleanu, George
    Dascalu, Monica
    Orfanu, Radu
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2018, 69 (08): : 2222 - 2224
  • [27] The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery - A mean follow-up of 12 years
    Wachtl, SW
    Jung, M
    Jakob, RP
    Gautier, E
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (08): : 959 - 963
  • [28] Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Reconstruction Cage and Porous Metal Augment to Treat Massive Acetabular Bone Loss: A Midterm Follow-Up
    Garceau, Simon P.
    Warschawski, Yaniv
    Joly, Denis
    Safir, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (07): : S636 - S641
  • [29] Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Jenkins, Derek R.
    Odland, Andrew N.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (10): : e49
  • [30] Minimal Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Concise Follow-up Report on Functional and Radiographic Outcomes at 10 Years
    Stevenson, Ciara
    Ogonda, Luke
    Blaney, Janine
    Dennison, Janice
    O'Brien, Seamus
    Beverland, David
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (20): : 1715 - 1720