Quantitative analysis from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using population-based versus individual arterial input functions, and comparison with semi-quantitative analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Xie, Tianwen [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Qiufeng [3 ]
Fu, Caixia [4 ]
Grimm, Robert [5 ]
Nickel, Marcel Dominik [5 ]
Hu, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Weijun [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Gu, Yajia [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Siemens Shenzhen Magnet Resonance Ltd, MR Applicat Dev, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, MR Applicat Predev, Erlangen, Germany
[6] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast neoplasm; Kinetics; Pharmacokinetics; Magnetic resonance imaging; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; TEMPORAL-RESOLUTION; PERFUSION PARAMETERS; CANCER; KINETICS; LESIONS; CURVE; REQUIREMENTS; MODEL; AIFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111501
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the value of inline quantitative analysis of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) using a population-based arterial input function (P-AIF) compared with offline quantitative analysis with an individual AIF (I-AIF) and semi-quantitative analysis for diagnosing breast cancer. Methods: This prospective study included 99 consecutive patients with 109 lesions (85 malignant and 24 benign). Model-based parameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) and model-free parameters (washin and washout) were derived from CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE (CDTV) DCE-MRI. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise covariate selection were performed to identify significant variables. The AUC and F1 score were assessed for semi-quantitative and two quantitative analyses. Results: kep from inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF for diagnosing breast cancer provided an AUC similar to kep from offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.782 vs 0.779, p = 0.954), higher compared to washin from semi-quantitative analysis (0.782 vs 0.630, p = 0.034). Furthermore, the inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF achieved the larger F1 score (0.920) compared with offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.780) and semiquantitative analysis (0.480). There were no statistically significant differences for kep values between the two quantitative analysis schemes (p = 0.944). Conclusion: The inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF from CDTV in characterizing breast lesions could offer similar diagnostic accuracy to offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF, and higher diagnostic accuracy to semiquantitative analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is a quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of added value for prostate cancer diagnosis?
    Turco, S.
    Fernandes, Dinis C.
    Miclea, R.
    Schoots, I. G.
    Nooijen, P.
    Van der Linden, H.
    Barentsz, J.
    Heijmink, S.
    Wijkstrah, H.
    Mischi, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S706 - S707
  • [32] Quantitative Analysis of Acute Benign and Malignant Vertebral Body Fractures Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Geith, Tobias
    Biffar, Andreas
    Schmidt, Gerwin
    Sourbron, Steven
    Duerr, Hans Roland
    Reiser, Maximilian
    Baur-Melnyk, Andrea
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (06) : W635 - W643
  • [33] Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Watanabe, Hiroyuki
    Higaki, Atsushi
    Moriya, Kazunori
    Kanki, Akihiko
    Fukukura, Yoshihiko
    Yamamoto, Akira
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [34] Diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Zhou, S. C.
    Wang, Y. J.
    Ai, T.
    Huang, L.
    Zhu, T. T.
    Zhu, W. Z.
    Xia, L. M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (05) : 409.e7 - 409.e16
  • [35] Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy
    Ziayee, F.
    Mueller-Lutz, A.
    Gross, J.
    Quentin, M.
    Ullrich, T.
    Heusch, P.
    Arsov, C.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Wittsack, H. J.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 53 : 28 - 33
  • [36] Kinetic Analysis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions With Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Standard Kinetic Assessment
    Abe, Hiroyuki
    Mori, Naoko
    Tsuchiya, Keiko
    Schacht, David V.
    Pineda, Federico D.
    Jiang, Yulei
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (05) : 1159 - 1166
  • [37] Image analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using variance dynamics
    Chen, W
    Giger, ML
    Bick, U
    Lan, L
    Newstead, GM
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 645 - 645
  • [38] Effectiveness of semi-quantitative multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of malignancy in complex adnexal masses: radiological and pathological correlation
    Livia Bernardin
    Philip Dilks
    Sidath Liyanage
    Marc E. Miquel
    Anju Sahdev
    Andrea Rockall
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 880 - 890
  • [39] Effectiveness of semi-quantitative multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of malignancy in complex adnexal masses: radiological and pathological correlation
    Bernardin, Livia
    Dilks, Philip
    Liyanage, Sidath
    Miquel, Marc E.
    Sahdev, Anju
    Rockall, Andrea
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 880 - 890
  • [40] Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis
    Pineda, Federico D.
    Medved, Milica
    Wang, Shiyang
    Fan, Xiaobing
    Schacht, David V.
    Sennett, Charlene
    Oto, Aytekin
    Newstead, Gillian M.
    Abe, Hiroyuki
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) : 1137 - 1144