Quantitative analysis from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using population-based versus individual arterial input functions, and comparison with semi-quantitative analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Xie, Tianwen [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Qiufeng [3 ]
Fu, Caixia [4 ]
Grimm, Robert [5 ]
Nickel, Marcel Dominik [5 ]
Hu, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Weijun [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Gu, Yajia [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Siemens Shenzhen Magnet Resonance Ltd, MR Applicat Dev, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, MR Applicat Predev, Erlangen, Germany
[6] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast neoplasm; Kinetics; Pharmacokinetics; Magnetic resonance imaging; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; TEMPORAL-RESOLUTION; PERFUSION PARAMETERS; CANCER; KINETICS; LESIONS; CURVE; REQUIREMENTS; MODEL; AIFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111501
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the value of inline quantitative analysis of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) using a population-based arterial input function (P-AIF) compared with offline quantitative analysis with an individual AIF (I-AIF) and semi-quantitative analysis for diagnosing breast cancer. Methods: This prospective study included 99 consecutive patients with 109 lesions (85 malignant and 24 benign). Model-based parameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) and model-free parameters (washin and washout) were derived from CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE (CDTV) DCE-MRI. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise covariate selection were performed to identify significant variables. The AUC and F1 score were assessed for semi-quantitative and two quantitative analyses. Results: kep from inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF for diagnosing breast cancer provided an AUC similar to kep from offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.782 vs 0.779, p = 0.954), higher compared to washin from semi-quantitative analysis (0.782 vs 0.630, p = 0.034). Furthermore, the inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF achieved the larger F1 score (0.920) compared with offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.780) and semiquantitative analysis (0.480). There were no statistically significant differences for kep values between the two quantitative analysis schemes (p = 0.944). Conclusion: The inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF from CDTV in characterizing breast lesions could offer similar diagnostic accuracy to offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF, and higher diagnostic accuracy to semiquantitative analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Arterial Input Function Selection on the Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Quantitative Analysis for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Azahaf, Mustapha
    Haberley, Marc
    Betrouni, Nacim
    Ernst, Olivier
    Behal, Helene
    Duhamel, Alain
    Ouzzane, Adil
    Puech, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (03) : 737 - 749
  • [22] Semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as prostate cancer imaging biomarkers for biologically targeted radiation therapy
    Hayley M. Reynolds
    Sirisha Tadimalla
    Yu-Feng Wang
    Maryam Montazerolghaem
    Yu Sun
    Scott Williams
    Catherine Mitchell
    Mary E. Finnegan
    Declan G. Murphy
    Annette Haworth
    Cancer Imaging, 22
  • [23] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion of normal muscle in adult hips: Variation of permeability and semi-quantitative parameters
    El Rafei, Mazen
    Teixeira, Pedro
    Norberciak, Laurene
    Badr, Sammy
    Cotten, Anne
    Budzik, Jean-Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 108 : 92 - 98
  • [24] Semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as prostate cancer imaging biomarkers for biologically targeted radiation therapy
    Reynolds, Hayley M.
    Tadimalla, Sirisha
    Wang, Yu-Feng
    Montazerolghaem, Maryam
    Sun, Yu
    Williams, Scott
    Mitchell, Catherine
    Finnegan, Mary E.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Haworth, Annette
    CANCER IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [25] Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Wei Ju
    Wang Cong
    Xie Xianxi
    Jiang Daqin
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2019, 85 (06) : 645 - 653
  • [26] Quantitative Analysis of Prostate MRI: Correlation between Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters
    Choi, Moon-Hyung
    Lee, Young-Joon
    Han, Dongyeob
    Kim, Dong-Hyun
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (12) : 10299 - 10310
  • [27] Semi-quantitative contrast-enhanced MR analysis of indeterminate ovarian tumours: when to say malignancy?
    Mansour, S. M.
    Saraya, S.
    El-Faissal, Y.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1053):
  • [28] Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice
    Taxt, Torfinn
    Reed, Rolf K.
    Pavlin, Tina
    Rygh, Cecilie Brekke
    Andersen, Erling
    Jirik, Radovan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 46 : 10 - 20
  • [29] Evaluation of semi-quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters for prostate cancer in correlation to whole-mount histopathology
    Isebaert, Sofie
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Haustermans, Karin
    Lerut, Evelyne
    Roskams, Tania
    Roebben, Ilse
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Joniau, Steven
    Oyen, Raymond
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (03) : E217 - E222
  • [30] Quantitative investigation of solitary pulmonary nodules: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and histopathologic analysis
    Zou, Yu
    Zhang, Minming
    Wang, Qidong
    Shang, Desheng
    Wang, Lijun
    Yu, Guowei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (01) : 252 - 259