Quantitative analysis from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using population-based versus individual arterial input functions, and comparison with semi-quantitative analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Xie, Tianwen [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Qiufeng [3 ]
Fu, Caixia [4 ]
Grimm, Robert [5 ]
Nickel, Marcel Dominik [5 ]
Hu, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Weijun [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Gu, Yajia [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Siemens Shenzhen Magnet Resonance Ltd, MR Applicat Dev, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, MR Applicat Predev, Erlangen, Germany
[6] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast neoplasm; Kinetics; Pharmacokinetics; Magnetic resonance imaging; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; TEMPORAL-RESOLUTION; PERFUSION PARAMETERS; CANCER; KINETICS; LESIONS; CURVE; REQUIREMENTS; MODEL; AIFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111501
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the value of inline quantitative analysis of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) using a population-based arterial input function (P-AIF) compared with offline quantitative analysis with an individual AIF (I-AIF) and semi-quantitative analysis for diagnosing breast cancer. Methods: This prospective study included 99 consecutive patients with 109 lesions (85 malignant and 24 benign). Model-based parameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) and model-free parameters (washin and washout) were derived from CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE (CDTV) DCE-MRI. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise covariate selection were performed to identify significant variables. The AUC and F1 score were assessed for semi-quantitative and two quantitative analyses. Results: kep from inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF for diagnosing breast cancer provided an AUC similar to kep from offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.782 vs 0.779, p = 0.954), higher compared to washin from semi-quantitative analysis (0.782 vs 0.630, p = 0.034). Furthermore, the inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF achieved the larger F1 score (0.920) compared with offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.780) and semiquantitative analysis (0.480). There were no statistically significant differences for kep values between the two quantitative analysis schemes (p = 0.944). Conclusion: The inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF from CDTV in characterizing breast lesions could offer similar diagnostic accuracy to offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF, and higher diagnostic accuracy to semiquantitative analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis
    Galbraith, SM
    Lodge, MA
    Taylor, NJ
    Rustin, GJS
    Bentzen, S
    Stirling, JJ
    Padhani, AR
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 15 (02) : 132 - 142
  • [2] Evaluation of Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity by the Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI - a Comparison of Quantitative and Semi-Quantitative Methods
    Kala, David
    Sulc, Vlastimil
    Olserova, Anna
    Svoboda, Jan
    Prysiazhniuk, Yeva
    Posusta, Antonin
    Kyncl, Martin
    Sanda, Jan
    Tomek, Ales
    Otahal, Jakub
    PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 71 : S259 - S275
  • [3] Semi-quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion in children using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Fetita, Catalin
    Thong, William E.
    Ou, Phalla
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 8670
  • [4] Feasibility of using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating thymic carcinoma from thymic lymphoma based on semi-quantitative and quantitative models
    Shen, J.
    Xue, L.
    Zhong, Y.
    Wu, Y-L
    Zhang, W.
    Yu, T-F
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (07) : 560.e19 - 560.e25
  • [5] Comparison of semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluations of vertebral marrow perfusion in a rat osteoporosis model
    Zhu, Jingqi
    Xiong, Zuogang
    Zhang, Jiulong
    Qiu, Yuyou
    Hua, Ting
    Tang, Guangyu
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [6] Comparison of semi-quantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluations of vertebral marrow perfusion in a rat osteoporosis model
    Jingqi Zhu
    Zuogang Xiong
    Jiulong Zhang
    Yuyou Qiu
    Ting Hua
    Guangyu Tang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [7] A quantitative comparison of the influence of individual versus population-derived vascular input functions on dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI in small animals
    Loveless, Mary E.
    Halliday, Jane
    Liess, Carsten
    Xu, Lei
    Dortch, Richard D.
    Whisenant, Jennifer
    Waterton, John C.
    Gore, John C.
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 67 (01) : 226 - 236
  • [8] Arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to diagnose prostate cancer
    Ziayee, Farid
    Mueller-Lutz, Anja
    Gross, Janina
    Ullrich, Tim
    Quentin, Michael
    Arsov, Christian
    Antoch, Gerald
    Wittsack, Hans-Joerg
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (02) : 108 - 114
  • [9] Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function
    Kim, Jae-Hun
    Im, Geun Ho
    Yang, Jehoon
    Choi, Dongil
    Lee, Won Jae
    Lee, Jung Hee
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2012, 25 (04) : 674 - 684
  • [10] Quantitative versus Subjective Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI for O-RADS?
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Woo, Sungmin
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (03) : 576 - 577