A randomized trial to compare the live birth rate following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus the antagonist protocol in women with anticipated high ovarian responses

被引：0
|
作者：
Ng, E. [1 ]
Chen, Z. Q. [2 ]
Zhang, Y. [2 ]
Li, H. [3 ,4 ]
Wang, J. Y. [2 ]
Wang, L. [2 ]
Ai, A. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Ctr Assisted Reprod, Sch Med, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Ji Ai Genet, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] IVF Inst Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源：
HUMAN REPRODUCTION | 2024年 / 39卷
关键词：
D O I：
10.1093/humrep/deae108.184
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
P-577
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GnRH antagonist protocol versus progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deng, Renhe
    Wang, Jinyuan
    He, Junhui
    Lei, Xin
    Zi, Dan
    Nong, Weihua
    Lei, Xiaocan
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 309 (04) : 1151 - 1163
  • [22] GnRH antagonist protocol versus progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Renhe Deng
    Jinyuan Wang
    Junhui He
    Xin Lei
    Dan Zi
    Weihua Nong
    Xiaocan Lei
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 309 : 1151 - 1163
  • [23] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval
    Kao, Tzu-Ching
    Hsieh, Yun-Chiao
    Yang, Ih-Jane
    Wu, Ming-Yih
    Chen, Mei -Jou
    Yang, Jehn-Hsiahn
    Chen, Shee-Uan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 122 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [24] Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation is a non-inferior alternative to the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation: a propensity score weighting analysis
    Duc, T. Le
    Long, H. B.
    Do, T. T. T.
    Phan, N. Q.
    Giap, T. M. P.
    Nguyen, T. L. H.
    Le, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [25] Comparison of neonatal outcomes and live-birth defects after progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization A large retrospective cohort study
    Wang, Ningling
    Lin, Jiaying
    Zhu, Qianqian
    Fan, Yong
    Wang, Yun
    Fu, Yonglun
    Kuang, Yanping
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (34)
  • [26] Effectiveness of the flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol compared to the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with decreased ovarian reserve
    Turkgeldi, Engin
    Yildiz, Sule
    Cekic, Sebile Guler
    Shakerian, Bahar
    Keles, Ipek
    Ata, Baris
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (02) : 306 - 312
  • [27] Validating the Use of Corifollitropin Alfa in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Normal and High Responders by Comparing with Conventional Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Study
    Huang, Chen-Yu
    Chen, Guan-Yeu
    Shieh, Miawh-Lirng
    Li, Hsin-Yang
    LIFE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (06): : 1 - 14
  • [28] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study
    Huang, Pinxiu
    Tang, Minling
    Qin, Aiping
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 48 (02) : 99 - 102
  • [29] Comment on "Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval"
    Wu, Shangqing
    Yang, Dongbao
    Ma, Jianxin
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 123 (03) : 420 - 421
  • [30] Granulosa cells apoptosis and follicular fluid hormones: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocols
    Li, Xiaolan
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Cai, Jiawei
    Pang, Jiahui
    Sun, Peng
    Chen, Jianhui
    Wang, Meng
    Liang, Xiaoyan
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (07) : 609 - 613
12345