Coupling management ecosystem service supply-supply trade-offs and supply-demand trade-offs: Framework and practice

被引:3
|
作者
Su, Boru [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Moucheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Resource Use & Environm Remediat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Supply-demand trade -off; Supply -supply trade -off; Coupling management; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOESS PLATEAU; LAKE BASIN; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112258
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ESs) are the bridge between ecosystem and social system, and how to effectively manage different types of ES trade-offs is the key barrier to ensure that ecosystems provide sustainable benefits for human beings. The objective of this study is to propose a theoretical and methodological framework for the coupled management of ES supply-supply trade-offs and demand-demand trade-offs and to propose an ES trade-offs management scheme for the study area (Jiangxi Province) according to this framework. In this study, we evaluated the provision of ES and the intensity of two types of ES trade-offs in the study area through InVest model, and explored the driving mechanism of the two types of ES trade-offs through redundancy analysis. Finally, we proposed a land use structure in the study area that alleviates the intensity of both types of ES tradeoffs through multi-objective nonlinear programming. The results showed that: (1) the water yield service supply in Jiangxi Province showed a pattern of high in the north and low in the south, and the carbon sequestration service supply showed a pattern of high in the south and low in the north. (2) The supply-supply trade-off intensity of two ES is generally low in the north and high in the south, and the supply-demand trade-off intensity of water yield service and carbon sequestration service is basically high in the densely populated area in the north of Jiangxi. (3) Forestland area, farmland area and water area are the supply-demand trade-off driving forces of water yield service and carbon sequestration service, grassland area is an independent driving force of carbon sequestration service, and farmland area and cultivated land area are the supply-supply trade-off driving forces. The study shows that in order to achieve the lowest supply-supply trade-off intensity and supply-demand tradeoff intensity in Jiangxi Province at the same time, the forestland should reach at least 104470 km2, the water area should reach 12,900.7 km2, the farmland area should reach 281333.3 km2, and the grassland area should increase to 15,457.9 km2. The results are expected to provide a new perspective for ecosystem management research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trade-offs among lean, green and agile concepts in supply chain management: Literature review
    Bouhannana, Fadwa
    Elkorchi, Akram
    LOGISTIQUA2020: 2020 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM OF LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (LOGISTIQUA 2020), 2020,
  • [42] A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services supply and trade-offs in European wood-pastures
    Torralba, Mario
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Hartel, Tibor
    Moreno, Gerardo
    Plieninger, Tobias
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2018, 4 (05):
  • [43] TRADE-OFFS AND TEACHER IN-SERVICE
    WALSTAD, WB
    MCFARLAND, M
    SOCIAL EDUCATION, 1980, 44 (05) : 410 - 411
  • [44] The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China
    Shui, Wei
    Wu, Kexin
    Du, Yong
    Yang, Haifeng
    LAND, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [45] Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade-offs in two woody successions
    Dickie, Ian A.
    Yeates, Gregor W.
    St John, Mark G.
    Stevenson, Bryan A.
    Scott, John T.
    Rillig, Matthias C.
    Peltzer, Duane A.
    Orwin, Kate H.
    Kirschbaum, Miko U. F.
    Hunt, John E.
    Burrows, Larry E.
    Barbour, Margaret M.
    Aislabie, Jackie
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2011, 48 (04) : 926 - 934
  • [46] Ecosystem service trade-offs across global contexts and scales
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Balvanera, Patricia
    King, Elizabeth
    Polasky, Stephen
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [47] Analysis of Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ulansuhai Basin
    Wang, Lina
    Yu, Enyi
    Li, Shuang
    Fu, Xiao
    Wu, Gang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [48] Ecosystem service trade-offs in wetland management: drainage and rehabilitation of the Hula, Israel
    Cohen-Shacham, E.
    Dayan, T.
    Feitelson, E.
    de Groot, R. S.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1582 - 1601
  • [49] Soil management shapes ecosystem service provision and trade-offs in agricultural landscapes
    Tamburini, Giovanni
    De Simone, Serena
    Sigura, Maurizia
    Boscutti, Francesco
    Marini, Lorenzo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 283 (1837)
  • [50] Sustainable Supply Chain Planning and Optimization Trade-offs between Cost, GHG Emissions and Service Level
    Chaabane, Amin
    Geramianfar, Ramin
    2015 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORT (ICALT), 2015, : 227 - 232