Coupling management ecosystem service supply-supply trade-offs and supply-demand trade-offs: Framework and practice

被引:3
|
作者
Su, Boru [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Moucheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Resource Use & Environm Remediat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Supply-demand trade -off; Supply -supply trade -off; Coupling management; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOESS PLATEAU; LAKE BASIN; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112258
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services (ESs) are the bridge between ecosystem and social system, and how to effectively manage different types of ES trade-offs is the key barrier to ensure that ecosystems provide sustainable benefits for human beings. The objective of this study is to propose a theoretical and methodological framework for the coupled management of ES supply-supply trade-offs and demand-demand trade-offs and to propose an ES trade-offs management scheme for the study area (Jiangxi Province) according to this framework. In this study, we evaluated the provision of ES and the intensity of two types of ES trade-offs in the study area through InVest model, and explored the driving mechanism of the two types of ES trade-offs through redundancy analysis. Finally, we proposed a land use structure in the study area that alleviates the intensity of both types of ES tradeoffs through multi-objective nonlinear programming. The results showed that: (1) the water yield service supply in Jiangxi Province showed a pattern of high in the north and low in the south, and the carbon sequestration service supply showed a pattern of high in the south and low in the north. (2) The supply-supply trade-off intensity of two ES is generally low in the north and high in the south, and the supply-demand trade-off intensity of water yield service and carbon sequestration service is basically high in the densely populated area in the north of Jiangxi. (3) Forestland area, farmland area and water area are the supply-demand trade-off driving forces of water yield service and carbon sequestration service, grassland area is an independent driving force of carbon sequestration service, and farmland area and cultivated land area are the supply-supply trade-off driving forces. The study shows that in order to achieve the lowest supply-supply trade-off intensity and supply-demand tradeoff intensity in Jiangxi Province at the same time, the forestland should reach at least 104470 km2, the water area should reach 12,900.7 km2, the farmland area should reach 281333.3 km2, and the grassland area should increase to 15,457.9 km2. The results are expected to provide a new perspective for ecosystem management research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety Stock, Excess Capacity or Diversification: Trade-Offs under Supply and Demand Uncertainty
    Chaturvedi, Aadhaar
    Martinez-de-Albeniz, Victor
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (01) : 77 - 95
  • [22] Land management influences trade-offs and the total supply of ecosystem services in alpine grassland in Tibet, China
    Wu, Junxi
    Zhao, Yan
    Yu, Chengqun
    Luo, Liming
    Pan, Ying
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 : 70 - 78
  • [23] Evaluating supply-demand matching of ecosystem services considering water-energy-food nexus and synergies/trade-offs in the Hangzhou of China
    Tonghui Ding
    Junfei Chen
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 54568 - 54585
  • [24] Evaluating supply-demand matching of ecosystem services considering water-energy-food nexus and synergies/trade-offs in the Hangzhou of China
    Ding, Tonghui
    Chen, Junfei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (19) : 54568 - 54585
  • [25] Trade-offs and synergies in the ecosystem service demand of urban brownfield stakeholders
    Washbourne, Carla-Leanne
    Goddard, Mark A.
    Le Provost, Gaetane
    Manning, David A. C.
    Manning, Peter
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 42
  • [26] Packaging logistics in supply chain practice - current state, trade-offs and improvement potential
    Palsson, Henrik
    Hellstrom, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 19 (05) : 351 - 368
  • [27] Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design
    Marti, Joana M. Comas
    Tancrez, Jean-Sebastien
    Seifert, Ralf W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 166 : 129 - 142
  • [28] Trade-offs in supply chain transparency: the case of Nudie Jeans Co
    Egels-Zanden, Niklas
    Hulthen, Kajsa
    Wulff, Gabriella
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 107 : 95 - 104
  • [29] Shadow pricing trade-offs between timber supply and environmental quality
    Rose, DW
    Husain, SA
    ASSESSMENT OF BIODIVERSITY FOR IMPROVED FOREST PLANNING, 1998, 51 (18): : 111 - 119
  • [30] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):