Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Saeed, Abdallah [1 ]
Elewidi, Mariam [1 ]
Nawlo, Ahmad [2 ]
Elzahaby, Amr [1 ]
Khaled, Asmaa [1 ]
Othman, Abdalla [1 ]
Abuelazm, Mohamed [1 ]
Abdelazeem, Basel [3 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Med, El Bahr St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
[3] West Virginia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Morgantown, WV USA
关键词
Ciprofol; general anaesthesia; meta-analysis; pain; propofol; sedation; systematic review; PARALLEL-GROUP; SINGLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER; MAINTENANCE; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_104_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Propofol has been used in medical practice as an anaesthetic drug for producing and sustaining general anaesthesia due to its advantages. However, it also has drawbacks, including injection-related discomfort. Recently, ciprofol has emerged as a promising anaesthetic drug that may overcome many drawbacks associated with propofol. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of ciprofol compared to propofol in different anaesthesia procedures. Methods: The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023458170). Central, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and WOS were searched for English literature until 26 February 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Nineteen randomised controlled trials were included in our analysis, with 2841 participants. There was no difference between ciprofol and propofol in the success rate of endoscopy (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.02; P = 0.44), while ciprofol showed a significant increase in the success rate of general anaesthesia/sedation (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.02; P = 0.04). Ciprofol showed significantly lower pain on injection (RR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.22; P < 0.001), lower adverse events (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.92; P = 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.48; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Ciprofol exhibited a comparable efficacy to propofol in inducing general anaesthesia and sedation with fewer adverse events, less pain on injection and higher patient satisfaction. These collective findings may suggest that ciprofol can be used as an alternative drug to ensure effective general anaesthesia/sedation induction in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Wu, Qingwu
    Yuan, Lianxiong
    Qiu, Huijun
    Wang, Xinyue
    Huang, Xuekun
    Zheng, Rui
    Yang, Qintai
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials
    Machado, Gustavo C.
    Maher, Chris G.
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Pinheiro, Marina B.
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    Day, Richard O.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Turmeric Extracts for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Singh, Ambrish
    Jones, Graeme
    Winzenberg, Tania
    Ding, Changhai
    Chopra, Arvind
    Das, Siddharth
    Danda, Debashish
    Laslett, Laura
    Antony, Benny
    CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 23 (02)
  • [44] Efficacy and Safety of Turmeric Extracts for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Zhiqiang Wang
    Ambrish Singh
    Graeme Jones
    Tania Winzenberg
    Changhai Ding
    Arvind Chopra
    Siddharth Das
    Debashish Danda
    Laura Laslett
    Benny Antony
    Current Rheumatology Reports, 2021, 23
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of local fibrinolytic therapy in intracranial hemorrhages: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Rajeswaran, Arun Babu
    Ali, Arshad
    Safi, Saleh
    Saleh, Ahmed Eid Abdulghani
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2024, 22
  • [46] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Elsaeidy, Ahmed Saad
    Ahmad, Aya Hisham Moussa
    Kohaf, Neveen A.
    Aboutaleb, Aya
    Kumar, Danisha
    Elsaeidy, Khaled Saad
    Mohamed, Ola saeed
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Shehata, Islam Mohammad
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2024, 28 (04) : 211 - 227
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in adult patients received elective surgeries: a meta‑analysis
    Dilireba Ainiwaer
    Wanwei Jiang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ahmed Saad Elsaeidy
    Aya Hisham Moussa Ahmad
    Neveen A. Kohaf
    Aya Aboutaleb
    Danisha Kumar
    Khaled Saad Elsaeidy
    Ola saeed Mohamed
    Alan D. Kaye
    Islam Mohammad Shehata
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2024, 28 : 211 - 227
  • [49] Safety and efficacy of combined use of propofol and etomidate for sedation during gastroscopy Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Lingyuan
    Liang, Xueyan
    Tan, Xinmei
    Wen, Haibin
    Jiang, Junsong
    Li, Yan
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (20)
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for general anaesthesia induction in elderly patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery A randomised controlled pilot trial
    Ding, Yun-ying
    Long, Yu-qin
    Yang, Hao-tian
    Zhuang, Kai
    Ji, Fu-hai
    Peng, Ke
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 39 (12) : 960 - 963