Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Saeed, Abdallah [1 ]
Elewidi, Mariam [1 ]
Nawlo, Ahmad [2 ]
Elzahaby, Amr [1 ]
Khaled, Asmaa [1 ]
Othman, Abdalla [1 ]
Abuelazm, Mohamed [1 ]
Abdelazeem, Basel [3 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Med, El Bahr St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
[3] West Virginia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Morgantown, WV USA
关键词
Ciprofol; general anaesthesia; meta-analysis; pain; propofol; sedation; systematic review; PARALLEL-GROUP; SINGLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER; MAINTENANCE; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_104_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Propofol has been used in medical practice as an anaesthetic drug for producing and sustaining general anaesthesia due to its advantages. However, it also has drawbacks, including injection-related discomfort. Recently, ciprofol has emerged as a promising anaesthetic drug that may overcome many drawbacks associated with propofol. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of ciprofol compared to propofol in different anaesthesia procedures. Methods: The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023458170). Central, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and WOS were searched for English literature until 26 February 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Nineteen randomised controlled trials were included in our analysis, with 2841 participants. There was no difference between ciprofol and propofol in the success rate of endoscopy (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.02; P = 0.44), while ciprofol showed a significant increase in the success rate of general anaesthesia/sedation (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.02; P = 0.04). Ciprofol showed significantly lower pain on injection (RR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.22; P < 0.001), lower adverse events (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.92; P = 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.48; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Ciprofol exhibited a comparable efficacy to propofol in inducing general anaesthesia and sedation with fewer adverse events, less pain on injection and higher patient satisfaction. These collective findings may suggest that ciprofol can be used as an alternative drug to ensure effective general anaesthesia/sedation induction in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Induction opioids for caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    White, L. D.
    Hodsdon, A.
    An, G. H.
    Thang, C.
    Melhuish, T. M.
    Vlok, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 40 : 4 - 13
  • [12] Safety and efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis
    Cheng, Xi
    Zhang, Pengyu
    Jiang, Dan
    Fang, Baoxia
    Chen, Fuchao
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [13] Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    De Filippo, Ovidio
    D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Bertaina, Maurizio
    Leone, Attilio
    Borzillo, Irene
    Ravetti, Emanuele
    Solano, Andrea
    Pagliassotto, Ilaria
    Nebiolo, Marco
    Bruno, Francesco
    Giacobbe, Federico
    Muscoli, Saverio
    Monticone, Silvia
    Brizzi, Maria Felice
    Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi
    De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [14] Efficacy and safety of aminoglycoside monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Vidal, L.
    Gafter-Gvili, A.
    Borok, S.
    Fraser, A.
    Leibovici, L.
    Paul, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S29 - S30
  • [15] Efficacy and safety of intraoperative controlled hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Dauterman, Leah
    Khan, Nabia
    Tebbe, Connor
    Li, Jiangqiong
    Sun, Yanhua
    Gunderman, David
    Liu, Ziyue
    Adams, David C.
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Meng, Lingzhong
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (05) : 940 - 954
  • [16] Efficacy and safety of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Aboulatta, Laila
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Aloud, Basma
    Askin, Nicole
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Shouman, Walid
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2022, 102 : 54 - 60
  • [17] Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Ovidio De Filippo
    Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
    Mario Iannaccone
    Maurizio Bertaina
    Attilio Leone
    Irene Borzillo
    Emanuele Ravetti
    Andrea Solano
    Ilaria Pagliassotto
    Marco Nebiolo
    Francesco Bruno
    Federico Giacobbe
    Saverio Muscoli
    Silvia Monticone
    Maria Felice Brizzi
    Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai
    Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 22
  • [18] Comparative effects of ciprofol and propofol on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Qi, Jiazheng
    Zhang, Lingjing
    Meng, Fanhua
    Yang, Xiaoyu
    Chen, Baoxuan
    Gao, Lingqi
    Zhao, Xu
    Luo, Mengqiang
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (02):
  • [19] Comments on "Postoperative delirium under general anesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials"
    Weng, Hsiu-Lan
    Liu, Ping-Hsin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2025, 103
  • [20] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) for procedural sedation and anesthesia induction in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen, Jiaxuan
    Liu, Chen
    Ding, Xueying
    Tian, Zimeng
    Jiang, Wenyu
    Wei, Xiuhong
    Liu, Xin
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)