Application of Survival Quilts for prognosis prediction of gastrectomy patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer database

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Lulu [1 ]
Niu, Penghui [1 ]
Wang, Wanqing [1 ]
Han, Xue [1 ]
Luan, Xiaoyi [1 ]
Huang, Huang [2 ]
Zhang, Yawei [2 ]
Zhao, Dongbing [1 ]
Gao, Jidong [3 ]
Chen, Yingtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Pancreat & Gastr Surg,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Dept Breast Surg Oncol, Shenzhen 518116, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Survival Quilts; Overall survival; Cancer specific survival; VALIDATION; RECURRENCE; NOMOGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Accurate prognosis prediction is critical for individualized-therapy making of gastric cancer patients. We aimed to develop and test 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction models for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. Methods We derived and tested Survival Quilts, a machine learning-based model, to develop 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS prediction models. Gastrectomy patients in the development set (n = 20,583) and the internal validation set (n = 5,106) were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, while those in the external validation set (n = 6,352) were recruited from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer (NCCGC) database. Furthermore, we selected gastrectomy patients without neoadjuvant therapy as a subgroup to train and test the prognostic models in order to keep the accuracy of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. Prognostic performances of these OS and CSS models were assessed using the Concordance Index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) values. Results The machine learning model had a consistently high accuracy in predicting 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS in the SEER development set (C-index = 0.861, 0.832, 0.789, 0.766, 0.740, and 0.709; AUC = 0.784, 0.828, 0.840, 0.849, 0.869, and 0.902, respectively), SEER validation set (C-index = 0.782, 0.739, 0.712, 0.698, 0.681, and 0.660; AUC = 0.751, 0.772, 0.767, 0.762, 0.766, and 0.787, respectively), and NCCGC set (C-index = 0.691, 0.756, 0.751, 0.737, 0.722, and 0.701; AUC = 0.769, 0.788, 0.790, 0.790, 0.787, and 0.788, respectively). The model was able to predict 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS in the SEER development set (C-index = 0.879, 0.858, 0.820, 0.802, 0.784, and 0.774; AUC = 0.756, 0.827, 0.852, 0.863, 0.874, and 0.884, respectively) and SEER validation set (C-index = 0.790, 0.763, 0.741, 0.729, 0.718, and 0.708; AUC = 0.706, 0.758, 0.767, 0.766, 0.766, and 0.764, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the high-risk group with risk score output by 5-year OS model was proved to be a strong survival predictor both in the SEER development set (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872-2.774, P < 0.001), SEER validation set (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 13.089-16.293, P < 0.001), and NCCGC set (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.617-2.437, P < 0.001). We further explored the prognostic value of risk score resulted 5-year CSS model of gastrectomy patients, and found that high-risk group remained as an independent CSS factor in the SEER development set (HR = 12.81, 95% CI: 11.568-14.194, P < 0.001) and SEER validation set (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.338-1.935, P < 0.001). Conclusion Survival Quilts could allow accurate prediction of 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS in gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 152
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database analysis
    Wei, Jianchang
    Yang, Ping
    Huang, Qing
    Chen, Zhuanpeng
    Zhang, Tong
    He, Feng
    Hu, He
    Zhong, Junbin
    Li, Wanglin
    Wei, Fang
    Wang, Qiang
    Cao, Jie
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (10) : 1185 - 1195
  • [2] Lung cancer in women - Analysis of the national surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
    Fu, JB
    Kau, TY
    Severson, RK
    Kalemkerian, GP
    CHEST, 2005, 127 (03) : 768 - 777
  • [3] Outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program (SEER) database analysis
    Li, Wenhan
    Tang, Yao
    Wang, Danfang
    Li, Jianhui
    ALL LIFE, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [4] Impact of Prior Cancer on the Prognosis of Patients With Laryngeal Cancer: A Population-Based Study Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
    Chen, Kailin
    Tian, Lamei
    Li, Yajun
    Jin, Yi
    Liu, Huai
    Wang, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [5] Cancer survival as a function of age at diagnosis: A study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database
    Bassily, Mena N.
    Wilson, Richard
    Pompei, Francesco
    Burmistrov, Dimitriy
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (06) : 667 - 681
  • [6] Lung cancer in young patients: Analysis of a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
    Ramalingam, S
    Pawlish, K
    Gadgeel, S
    Demers, R
    Kalemkerian, GP
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (02) : 651 - 657
  • [7] Lung cancer in elderly patients: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
    Owonikoko, Taofeek K.
    Ragin, Camille C.
    Belani, Chandra P.
    Oton, Ana B.
    Gooding, William E.
    Taioli, Emanuela
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (35) : 5570 - 5577
  • [8] Marital status and survival in patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database
    Wang, Xiangyang
    Cao, Weilan
    Zheng, Chenguo
    Hu, Wanle
    Liu, Changbao
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 54 : 119 - 124
  • [9] COMPARISON OF THE SURVEILLANCE, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND END RESULTS PROGRAM OF CANCER REGISTRIES AND NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE FOR RESEARCH ON COLORECTAL CANCER
    Liu, Po-Hong
    Singal, Amit G.
    Murphy, Caitlin C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S501 - S501
  • [10] Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation on Cancer Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis
    Ahmed, Armaan
    Whittington, Jennifer
    Shafaee, Zahra
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 2286 - 2294