Application of Survival Quilts for prognosis prediction of gastrectomy patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer database

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Lulu [1 ]
Niu, Penghui [1 ]
Wang, Wanqing [1 ]
Han, Xue [1 ]
Luan, Xiaoyi [1 ]
Huang, Huang [2 ]
Zhang, Yawei [2 ]
Zhao, Dongbing [1 ]
Gao, Jidong [3 ]
Chen, Yingtai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Pancreat & Gastr Surg,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Dept Breast Surg Oncol, Shenzhen 518116, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Survival Quilts; Overall survival; Cancer specific survival; VALIDATION; RECURRENCE; NOMOGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Accurate prognosis prediction is critical for individualized-therapy making of gastric cancer patients. We aimed to develop and test 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction models for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. Methods We derived and tested Survival Quilts, a machine learning-based model, to develop 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS prediction models. Gastrectomy patients in the development set (n = 20,583) and the internal validation set (n = 5,106) were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, while those in the external validation set (n = 6,352) were recruited from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer (NCCGC) database. Furthermore, we selected gastrectomy patients without neoadjuvant therapy as a subgroup to train and test the prognostic models in order to keep the accuracy of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. Prognostic performances of these OS and CSS models were assessed using the Concordance Index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) values. Results The machine learning model had a consistently high accuracy in predicting 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS in the SEER development set (C-index = 0.861, 0.832, 0.789, 0.766, 0.740, and 0.709; AUC = 0.784, 0.828, 0.840, 0.849, 0.869, and 0.902, respectively), SEER validation set (C-index = 0.782, 0.739, 0.712, 0.698, 0.681, and 0.660; AUC = 0.751, 0.772, 0.767, 0.762, 0.766, and 0.787, respectively), and NCCGC set (C-index = 0.691, 0.756, 0.751, 0.737, 0.722, and 0.701; AUC = 0.769, 0.788, 0.790, 0.790, 0.787, and 0.788, respectively). The model was able to predict 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS in the SEER development set (C-index = 0.879, 0.858, 0.820, 0.802, 0.784, and 0.774; AUC = 0.756, 0.827, 0.852, 0.863, 0.874, and 0.884, respectively) and SEER validation set (C-index = 0.790, 0.763, 0.741, 0.729, 0.718, and 0.708; AUC = 0.706, 0.758, 0.767, 0.766, 0.766, and 0.764, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the high-risk group with risk score output by 5-year OS model was proved to be a strong survival predictor both in the SEER development set (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.872-2.774, P < 0.001), SEER validation set (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 13.089-16.293, P < 0.001), and NCCGC set (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.617-2.437, P < 0.001). We further explored the prognostic value of risk score resulted 5-year CSS model of gastrectomy patients, and found that high-risk group remained as an independent CSS factor in the SEER development set (HR = 12.81, 95% CI: 11.568-14.194, P < 0.001) and SEER validation set (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.338-1.935, P < 0.001). Conclusion Survival Quilts could allow accurate prediction of 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and CSS in gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 152
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differences in cancer amputee survival based on marital status: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Ayaz, Talha
    Fredrickson, Saul
    O'Mary, Kevin
    Panchbhavi, Megna A.
    Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (02) : 203 - 214
  • [22] Prognostic factors of patients after liver cancer surgery Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database
    Liang, Fangfang
    Ma, Fuchao
    Zhong, Jincai
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (30) : E26694
  • [23] Comparison of Gastric Cancer Survival Between Caucasian and Asian Patients Treated in the United States: Results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
    Jiping Wang
    Yihong Sun
    Monica M. Bertagnolli
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 2965 - 2971
  • [24] Comparison of Gastric Cancer Survival Between Caucasian and Asian Patients Treated in the United States: Results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
    Wang, Jiping
    Sun, Yihong
    Bertagnolli, Monica M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) : 2965 - 2971
  • [25] Association of tumor size with prognosis in colon cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis
    Feng, Huolun
    Lyu, Zejian
    Zheng, Jiabin
    Zheng, Chengbin
    Wu, De Qing
    Liang, Weijun
    Li, Yong
    SURGERY, 2021, 169 (05) : 1116 - 1123
  • [26] Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for the prognosis of breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database
    Wu, Ruiyang
    Luo, Jing
    Wan, Hangyu
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Yuan, Yewei
    Hu, Huihua
    Feng, Jinyan
    Wen, Jing
    Wang, Yan
    Li, Junyan
    Liang, Qi
    Gan, Fengjiao
    Zhang, Gang
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [27] Survival analysis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
    Ali, Hassam
    Zweigle, Joshua
    Patel, Pratik
    Tedder, Brandon
    Khan, Rafeh
    Agrawal, Saurabh
    ANNALS OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2023, 27 (02) : 151 - 157
  • [28] Impact of Treatment Delay on the Prognosis of Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Population-based Study Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
    Zhao, Jing
    Chen, Ruiying
    Zhang, Yanli
    Wang, Yu
    Zhu, Haiyan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 15 (02): : 473 - 483
  • [29] Metastasis patterns and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based analysis
    Dong, Qiumei
    Huang, Minqing
    Lai, Xiaorong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (05) : 2079 - 2087
  • [30] The Effect of Targeted Therapy on Overall Survival in Advanced Renal Cancer: A Study of the National Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry Database
    Vaishampayan, Ulka
    Vankayala, Hema
    Vigneau, Fawn D.
    Quarshie, William
    Dickow, Brenda
    Chalasani, Supraja
    Schwartz, Kendra
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2014, 12 (02) : 124 - 129