Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation on Cancer Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmed, Armaan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Whittington, Jennifer [3 ,4 ]
Shafaee, Zahra [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biophys, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] NYC Hlth Hosp, Elmhurst Hosp, New York, NY 11373 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
EARLY-STAGE; HEAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction. To analyze the cancer burden in the United States, researchers are relying on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Our objective was to analyze differences in cancer outcome between Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited and non-accredited facilities.Methods. The SEER database was queried for diagnosis years 2018 and 2019. Only analytic cases were included. Observed survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for all cancer sites, stratified by accreditation status. Univariate analyses were performed to quantify differences in survival between cancer cases in CoC-accredited and non-CoC-accredited facilities. Cancers of interest were chosen based on statistical significance (p < 0.01) and clinical significance (> 25% difference in end survival). Multivariate analyses were conducted on cancers of interest.Results. Overall, there were 602,185 cases from CoC-accredited facilities and 198,492 from non-CoC-accredited facilities. 5 of 59 solid organ cancers showed statistically and clinically significant reductions in survival in non-accredited facilities (lung and bronchus: 27.9%; liver: 41.1%; esophagus: 30.4%; pancreas: 32.7%; intrahepatic bile duct: 39.4%). Multivariate analysis on these 5 cancers was performed. CoC accreditation was a statistically significant variable decreasing the hazard in all 5 cancers (hazard ratio 0.86-0.91; all p-values <0.005). All these cancers demand resource-intensive treatment.Conclusion. Accreditation has a significant impact on survival in 5/59 solid organ cancers. Although accredited facilities may be better apt to handle these cancer cases, the survival in most cancers is not significantly affected by accreditation. However, examining longer-term endpoints elucidate further nuances. Herein, CoC accreditation was found to be an independent variable impacting 2-year survival for a minority of cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1802 / 1803
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation on Cancer Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis
    Armaan Ahmed
    Jennifer Whittington
    Zahra Shafaee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2024, 31 : 2286 - 2294
  • [2] Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation on Cancer Survival: A SEER Database Analysis
    Ahmed, Armaan
    Shafaee, Zahra
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S96 - S97
  • [3] The determinants of recent gains in cancer survival: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Sun, E.
    Lakdawalla, D.
    Reyes, C.
    Goldman, D.
    Philipson, T.
    Jena, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [4] Impact of sentinel node technique on the survival in patients with vulvar cancer: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Canlorbe, G.
    Rouzier, R.
    Bendifallah, S.
    Chereau, E.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2012, 40 (11): : 647 - 651
  • [5] Marital status and survival in patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database
    Wang, Xiangyang
    Cao, Weilan
    Zheng, Chenguo
    Hu, Wanle
    Liu, Changbao
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 54 : 119 - 124
  • [6] Survival rates of male breast cancer compared to female: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis
    Mushtaq, Rao
    Shaik, Mohammed
    Mistry, Shams
    Alkharabsheh, Omar Abed
    Shaqfeh, Mahmoud
    Afsharimani, Seyedamirhossein
    Ahmad, Delshad
    Habte-Gabr, Eyassu
    Katato, Khalil
    Tamkus, Deimante
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [7] Differences in cancer amputee survival based on marital status: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
    Ayaz, Talha
    Fredrickson, Saul
    O'Mary, Kevin
    Panchbhavi, Megna A.
    Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (02) : 203 - 214
  • [8] The impact of marriage on the overall survival of prostate cancer patients: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis
    Liu, Yu
    Xia, Qi
    Xia, Jianling
    Zhu, Hua
    Jiang, Haihong
    Chen, Xiangjian
    Zheng, Yuancai
    Zhang, Fangyi
    Li, Shi
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (05): : E135 - E139
  • [9] Risk Factors for Brain Metastasis and Their Impact on Survival in Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) Database Analysis
    Franco, Diana
    Rehman, Mohammad
    Faraz, Fatima
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Saeed, Sajeel
    Basit, Jawad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S1169 - S1170
  • [10] Impact of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Survival of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis
    Shi, Xiaomao
    Peng, Jin
    Jiang, Huangang
    Gao, Yu
    Wang, Wenbo
    Zhou, Fuxiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11