Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation on Cancer Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmed, Armaan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Whittington, Jennifer [3 ,4 ]
Shafaee, Zahra [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biophys, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] NYC Hlth Hosp, Elmhurst Hosp, New York, NY 11373 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
EARLY-STAGE; HEAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction. To analyze the cancer burden in the United States, researchers are relying on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Our objective was to analyze differences in cancer outcome between Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited and non-accredited facilities.Methods. The SEER database was queried for diagnosis years 2018 and 2019. Only analytic cases were included. Observed survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for all cancer sites, stratified by accreditation status. Univariate analyses were performed to quantify differences in survival between cancer cases in CoC-accredited and non-CoC-accredited facilities. Cancers of interest were chosen based on statistical significance (p < 0.01) and clinical significance (> 25% difference in end survival). Multivariate analyses were conducted on cancers of interest.Results. Overall, there were 602,185 cases from CoC-accredited facilities and 198,492 from non-CoC-accredited facilities. 5 of 59 solid organ cancers showed statistically and clinically significant reductions in survival in non-accredited facilities (lung and bronchus: 27.9%; liver: 41.1%; esophagus: 30.4%; pancreas: 32.7%; intrahepatic bile duct: 39.4%). Multivariate analysis on these 5 cancers was performed. CoC accreditation was a statistically significant variable decreasing the hazard in all 5 cancers (hazard ratio 0.86-0.91; all p-values <0.005). All these cancers demand resource-intensive treatment.Conclusion. Accreditation has a significant impact on survival in 5/59 solid organ cancers. Although accredited facilities may be better apt to handle these cancer cases, the survival in most cancers is not significantly affected by accreditation. However, examining longer-term endpoints elucidate further nuances. Herein, CoC accreditation was found to be an independent variable impacting 2-year survival for a minority of cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1802 / 1803
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of lymph node evaluation on survival for small bowel adenocaricnoma: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database
    Overman, M. J.
    Hu, C.
    Wolff, R. A.
    Chang, G. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [22] Radiation Utilization and Overall Survival Trends for Resected Pancreatic Cancer in the United States: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database
    Wolfe, A. R.
    Miller, E. D.
    Pardo, D. A. Diaz
    Cloyd, J.
    Williams, T. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E605 - E605
  • [23] Is Perineural Invasion Associated With Poor Survival Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer? A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) Database Analysis
    Tariq, Usman
    Malik, Azeem
    Hans, Bandhul
    Karna, Rahul
    Abdul-Baki, Heitham
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S81 - S81
  • [24] Survival impact of neoadjuvant radiotherapy prior to esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results (SEER) analysis
    Ballonoff, A.
    McCammon, R.
    Rusthoven, K.
    Schefter, T.
    Kavanagh, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S108 - S108
  • [25] Thermal Ablation vs Surgery for Localized Kidney Cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Schutz, Fabio A. B.
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Silverman, Stuart G.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) : 93 - 98
  • [26] Temporal trends in small cell lung cancer: Analysis of the US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database
    Cohen, Sean
    Brennan, Ben
    Banerjee, Mousumi
    Kalemkerian, Gregory Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [27] Incidence of gastroesophageal junction cancer continues to rise: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
    Bartel, Michael
    Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik
    Bhurwal, Abhishek
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (04)
  • [28] Incidence and survival outcomes of secondary liver cancer: a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database analysis
    Wang, Zheng-Gang
    He, Zhi-Yi
    Chen, Yan-Yan
    Gao, Huan
    Du, Xing-Li
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (03) : 1273 - 1283
  • [29] Esophageal Cancer: An Updated Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database Analysis
    Then, Eric Omar
    Lopez, Michell
    Saleem, Saad
    Gayam, Vijay
    Sunkara, Tagore
    Culliford, Andrea
    Gaduputi, Vinaya
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (02) : 55 - 64
  • [30] Impact of marital status on survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: Results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database
    Qiu, Miaozhen
    Yang, Dajun
    Xu, Ruihua
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6