A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexicase-Based Selection Methods for Symbolic Regression Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Geiger, Alina [1 ]
Sobania, Dominik [1 ]
Rothlauf, Franz [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Mainz, Germany
来源
关键词
Symbolic Regression; Genetic Programming; Lexicase Selection;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-56957-9_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Lexicase selection is a parent selection method that has been successfully used in many application domains. In recent years, several variants of lexicase selection have been proposed and analyzed. However, it is still unclear which lexicase variant performs best in the domain of symbolic regression. Therefore, we compare in this work relevant lexicase variants on a wide range of symbolic regression problems. We conduct experiments not only over a given evaluation budget but also over a given time as practitioners usually have limited time for solving their problems. Consequently, this work provides users a comprehensive guide for choosing the right selection method under different constraints in the domain of symbolic regression. Overall, we find that down-sampled is an element of-lexicase selection outperforms other selection methods on the studied benchmark problems for the given evaluation budget and for the given time. The improvements with respect to solution quality are up to 68% using down-sampled is an element of-lexicase selection given a time budget of 24 h.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 208
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for regression modeling of continuous outcomes
    O'Connell, Nathaniel S.
    Jaeger, Byron C.
    Bullock, Garrett S.
    Speiser, Jaime Lynn
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2025, 26 (02)
  • [32] Feature selection for regression problems based on the Morisita estimator of intrinsic dimension
    Golay, Jean
    Leuenberger, Michael
    Kanevski, Mikhail
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2017, 70 : 126 - 138
  • [33] A Comparative Analysis of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Genetic Programming to Solve High-Dimensional Symbolic Regression Problems
    Zhong, Lianjie
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Lu, Chengyu
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2021, : 476 - 483
  • [34] Distribution based truncation for variable selection in subspace methods for multivariate regression
    Liland, Kristian Hovde
    Hoy, Martin
    Martens, Harald
    Saebo, Solve
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2013, 122 : 103 - 111
  • [35] A Loss-Based Prior for Variable Selection in Linear Regression Methods
    Villa, Cristiano
    Lee, Jeong Eun
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2020, 15 (02): : 533 - 558
  • [36] COMPARISON OF UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION METHODS FOR CNN-BASED REGRESSION
    Wursthorn, K.
    Hillemann, M.
    Ulrich, M.
    XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION II, 2022, 43-B2 : 721 - 728
  • [37] Comparison of Regression Methods in Permission Based Android Malware Detection
    Sahin, Durmus Ozkan
    Kural, Oguz Emre
    Akleylek, Sedat
    Kilic, Erdal
    2020 28TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2020,
  • [38] A comparison of regression methods based on dimensional reduction for genomic prediction
    da Costa, J. A.
    Azevedo, C. F.
    Nascimento, M.
    Silva, F. F. E.
    de Resende, M. D., V
    Nascimento, A. C. C.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2021, 20 (02):
  • [40] A comprehensive comparison between real population based tournament selection and virtual population based tournament selection
    Hong, Yi
    Kwong, Sam
    Ren, Qingsheng
    Wang, Xiong
    2007 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-10, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 445 - +