A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexicase-Based Selection Methods for Symbolic Regression Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Geiger, Alina [1 ]
Sobania, Dominik [1 ]
Rothlauf, Franz [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Mainz, Germany
来源
关键词
Symbolic Regression; Genetic Programming; Lexicase Selection;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-56957-9_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Lexicase selection is a parent selection method that has been successfully used in many application domains. In recent years, several variants of lexicase selection have been proposed and analyzed. However, it is still unclear which lexicase variant performs best in the domain of symbolic regression. Therefore, we compare in this work relevant lexicase variants on a wide range of symbolic regression problems. We conduct experiments not only over a given evaluation budget but also over a given time as practitioners usually have limited time for solving their problems. Consequently, this work provides users a comprehensive guide for choosing the right selection method under different constraints in the domain of symbolic regression. Overall, we find that down-sampled is an element of-lexicase selection outperforms other selection methods on the studied benchmark problems for the given evaluation budget and for the given time. The improvements with respect to solution quality are up to 68% using down-sampled is an element of-lexicase selection given a time budget of 24 h.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 208
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF VARIABLE SELECTION AND REGRESSION METHODS IN MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION OF A PROCESS ANALYZER
    HEIKKA, R
    MINKKINEN, P
    TAAVITSAINEN, VM
    PROCESS CONTROL AND QUALITY, 1994, 6 (01): : 47 - 54
  • [22] A Comparison of methods for leader selection in Many-Objective problems
    Castro Junior, Olacir Rodrigues
    Britto, Andre
    Pozo, Aurora
    2012 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2012,
  • [23] Comparison of experimental designs for simulation-based symbolic regression of manufacturing systems
    Can, Birkan
    Heavey, Cathal
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 61 (03) : 447 - 462
  • [24] A COMPARISON OF OF SYMBOLIC REGRESSION MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR MAPPING EQ-5D UTILITIES
    Crott, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12)
  • [25] A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO AUTOMATED INSPECTION DEVICE SELECTION PROBLEMS USING ELECTRE METHODS
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Mondal, Suprakash
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 5 (02) : 193 - 208
  • [26] UNIFICATION OF REGRESSION-BASED METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION
    Morrissey, Michael B.
    Sakrejda, Krzysztof
    EVOLUTION, 2013, 67 (07) : 2094 - 2100
  • [27] Comparison of Regression Methods for Knowledge-Based Planning
    Zhang, J.
    Ge, Y.
    Xie, T.
    Sheng, Y.
    Yin, F.
    Wu, Q.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2907 - 2907
  • [28] Comparison of Bayesian model averaging and stepwise methods for model selection in logistic regression
    Wang, DL
    Zhang, WY
    Bakhai, A
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (22) : 3451 - 3467
  • [29] The comparison of logistic regression model selection methods for the prediction of coronary artery disease
    Colak, Cemil
    Colak, M. Cengiz
    Orman, Mebmet N.
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 7 (01): : 6 - 11
  • [30] Eigenvector selection for cyclic-subspace regression with comparison to traditional methods.
    Fairchild, SZ
    Green, RL
    Kalivas, J
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 219 : U109 - U109