A Comprehensive Comparison of Lexicase-Based Selection Methods for Symbolic Regression Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Geiger, Alina [1 ]
Sobania, Dominik [1 ]
Rothlauf, Franz [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Mainz, Germany
来源
关键词
Symbolic Regression; Genetic Programming; Lexicase Selection;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-56957-9_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Lexicase selection is a parent selection method that has been successfully used in many application domains. In recent years, several variants of lexicase selection have been proposed and analyzed. However, it is still unclear which lexicase variant performs best in the domain of symbolic regression. Therefore, we compare in this work relevant lexicase variants on a wide range of symbolic regression problems. We conduct experiments not only over a given evaluation budget but also over a given time as practitioners usually have limited time for solving their problems. Consequently, this work provides users a comprehensive guide for choosing the right selection method under different constraints in the domain of symbolic regression. Overall, we find that down-sampled is an element of-lexicase selection outperforms other selection methods on the studied benchmark problems for the given evaluation budget and for the given time. The improvements with respect to solution quality are up to 68% using down-sampled is an element of-lexicase selection given a time budget of 24 h.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 208
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Down-Sampled Epsilon-Lexicase Selection for Real-World Symbolic Regression Problems
    Geiger, Alma
    Sobania, Dominik
    Rothlauf, Franz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, GECCO 2023, 2023, : 1109 - 1117
  • [2] Genetic Programming-Based Selection of Imputation Methods in Symbolic Regression with Missing Values
    Al-Helali, Baligh
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    AI 2020: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 12576 : 163 - 175
  • [3] Comparison of regression tree-based methods in genomic selection
    Ashoori-Banaei, Sahar
    Ghafouri-Kesbi, Farhad
    Ahmadi, Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2021, 100 (02)
  • [4] Comparison of regression tree-based methods in genomic selection
    Sahar Ashoori-Banaei
    Farhad Ghafouri-Kesbi
    Ahmad Ahmadi
    Journal of Genetics, 2021, 100
  • [5] Evaluating methods for constant optimization of symbolic regression benchmark problems
    de Melo, Vinicius Veloso
    Fowler, Benjamin
    Banzhaf, Wolfgang
    2015 BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS 2015), 2015, : 25 - 30
  • [6] CovSel: A New Approach for Ensemble Selection Applied to Symbolic Regression Problems
    Sobania, Dominik
    Rothlauf, Franz
    GECCO'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2018, : 529 - 536
  • [7] Automated Grammar-based Feature Selection in Symbolic Regression
    Ali, Muhammad Sarmad
    Kshirsagar, Meghana
    Naredo, Enrique
    Ryan, Conor
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 902 - 910
  • [8] Difference-based firefly programming for symbolic regression problems
    Aliwi, Mohamed
    Demirci, Sercan
    Aslan, Selcuk
    COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2023, 86
  • [9] A Review and Comparison of Bandwidth Selection Methods for Kernel Regression
    Koehler, Max
    Schindler, Anja
    Sperlich, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2014, 82 (02) : 243 - 274
  • [10] A comparison of some thresholding selection methods for wavelet regression
    Altaher, Alsaidi M.
    Ismail, Mohd T.
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 62 : 119 - 125