Sonography in the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects: An in vitro study on native human mandibles

被引:0
|
作者
Bykhovsky, Igor [1 ]
Hildner, Alexander [2 ]
Kripfgans, Oliver D. [3 ]
Mengel, Reiner [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg Lahn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthet Dent, Georg Voigt Str 3, D-35039 Marburg, Germany
[2] Alcedis GmbH, Giessen, Germany
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
dental implant; diagnostics; human cadaver study; peri-implant bone defects; sonography; DIGITAL VOLUME TOMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; HEALTH; PIG;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14302
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study on native human cadavers was to compare clinical, sonographic, and radiological measurements of fenestrations, dehiscences, and 3-wall bone defects on implants. Materials and Methods The examination was carried out on five human mandibles. After the insertion of 27 implants, dehiscences (n = 14), fenestrations (n = 7) and 3-wall bone defects (n = 6) were prepared in a standardized manner. The direct measurement of the bone defects was carried out with a periodontal probe and the radiological examination was carried out using digital volume tomography (DVT). The ultrasound examination (US) was performed using a clinical 24-MHz US imaging probe. Means and standard deviations of the direct, US, and DVT measurements were calculated. Measurements were statistically compared using the Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Bone defects were on average 3.22 +/- 1.58 mm per direct measurement, 2.90 +/- 1.47 mm using US, and 2.99 +/- 1.52 mm per DVT assessment. Pairwise correlations of these measurements were R = .94 (p < .0001) between direct and US, R = .95 (p < .0001) between DVT and US, and R = .96 (p < .0001) between direct and DVT. The mean differences of the measurements (and 95% CI) between direct and US was 0.41 (-0.47 to 1.29), US and DVT 0.33 (-0.30 to 0.97), and direct and DVT 0.28 (-0.50 to 1.07). Conclusion All peri-implant bone defects could be identified and sonographically measured. US measurements showed a strong correlation with direct and DVT measurements. The sonographic measurement accuracy was highest for dehiscences, followed by fenestrations and 3-wall bone defects.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1137
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bone regeneration using titanium plate stabilization for the treatment of peri-implant bone defects: A retrospective radiologic pilot study
    Duan, Deng-Hui
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Xiao, Wu-Cai
    Liu, Zheng
    Wang, En-Bo
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (06) : 792 - 800
  • [32] Revisiting peri-implant soft tissue - histopathological study of the peri-implant soft tissue
    Silva, Eduarda
    Felix, Sergio
    Rodriguez-Archilla, Alberto
    Oliveira, Pedro
    dos Santos, Jose Martins
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (02): : 611 - 618
  • [33] Role of the surface in peri-implant bone biology
    Lopez-Valverde, Antonio
    Borges, Tiago
    Vale, Francisco
    De Sousa, Bruno Macedo
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [34] Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone
    Rebaudi, A
    Koller, B
    Laib, A
    Trisi, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2004, 24 (04) : 317 - +
  • [35] Effects of alendronate on the peri-implant bone in rats
    Oh, K. C.
    Moon, H. S.
    Lee, J. H.
    Park, Y. B.
    Kim, J-H
    ORAL DISEASES, 2015, 21 (02) : 248 - 256
  • [36] Diagnosis of inflammatory peri-implant diseases using an immunochromatographic assay for calprotectin in peri-implant crevicular fluid
    Rie Kido
    Jun-ichi Kido
    Yasufumi Nishikawa
    Eijiro Sakamoto
    Yoritoki Tomotake
    Hiromichi Yumoto
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [37] Effects of Peri-implant Mucosal Characteristics on Clinical Peri-implant Parameters: A Retrospective Study
    Bozkurt, Esra
    Uslu, Mustafa Ozay
    MEANDROS MEDICAL AND DENTAL JOURNAL, 2023, 24 (02): : 105 - 111
  • [38] Stress Related Peri-Implant Bone Loss
    Flanagan, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (04) : 325 - 327
  • [39] The basic science of peri-implant bone healing
    Paul R. T. Kuzyk
    Emil H. Schemitsch
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2011, 45 : 108 - 115
  • [40] The basic science of peri-implant bone healing
    Kuzyk, Paul R. T.
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 45 (02) : 108 - 115