Sonography in the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects: An in vitro study on native human mandibles

被引:0
|
作者
Bykhovsky, Igor [1 ]
Hildner, Alexander [2 ]
Kripfgans, Oliver D. [3 ]
Mengel, Reiner [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg Lahn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthet Dent, Georg Voigt Str 3, D-35039 Marburg, Germany
[2] Alcedis GmbH, Giessen, Germany
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
dental implant; diagnostics; human cadaver study; peri-implant bone defects; sonography; DIGITAL VOLUME TOMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; HEALTH; PIG;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14302
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study on native human cadavers was to compare clinical, sonographic, and radiological measurements of fenestrations, dehiscences, and 3-wall bone defects on implants. Materials and Methods The examination was carried out on five human mandibles. After the insertion of 27 implants, dehiscences (n = 14), fenestrations (n = 7) and 3-wall bone defects (n = 6) were prepared in a standardized manner. The direct measurement of the bone defects was carried out with a periodontal probe and the radiological examination was carried out using digital volume tomography (DVT). The ultrasound examination (US) was performed using a clinical 24-MHz US imaging probe. Means and standard deviations of the direct, US, and DVT measurements were calculated. Measurements were statistically compared using the Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Bone defects were on average 3.22 +/- 1.58 mm per direct measurement, 2.90 +/- 1.47 mm using US, and 2.99 +/- 1.52 mm per DVT assessment. Pairwise correlations of these measurements were R = .94 (p < .0001) between direct and US, R = .95 (p < .0001) between DVT and US, and R = .96 (p < .0001) between direct and DVT. The mean differences of the measurements (and 95% CI) between direct and US was 0.41 (-0.47 to 1.29), US and DVT 0.33 (-0.30 to 0.97), and direct and DVT 0.28 (-0.50 to 1.07). Conclusion All peri-implant bone defects could be identified and sonographically measured. US measurements showed a strong correlation with direct and DVT measurements. The sonographic measurement accuracy was highest for dehiscences, followed by fenestrations and 3-wall bone defects.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1137
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cerasorb® for filling critical peri-implant defects
    Faloni, Ana Paula de Souza
    Marques, Daniela Oliveira
    Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
    Machado, Joao Paulo Lima
    Justo, Yasmin Mayara
    Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues
    Okamoto, Roberta
    dos Santos, Pamela Leticia
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2024, 36 (04) : 449 - 458
  • [22] Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: A comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts
    Lorenzoni, M
    Pertl, C
    Keil, C
    Wegscheider, WA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (05) : 639 - 646
  • [23] Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone - An experimental study in the dog
    Botticelli, D
    Berglundh, T
    Lindhe, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (04) : 309 - 317
  • [24] Influence of peri-implant bone quality on implant stability
    Schiuma, Damiano
    Plecko, Michael
    Kloub, Martin
    Rothstock, Stephan
    Windolf, Markus
    Gueorguiev, Boyko
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2013, 35 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [25] Accuracy of intraoral digital radiography in detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Matsuda, Y
    Hanazawa, T
    Seki, K
    Sano, T
    Okano, T
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 2954 - 2954
  • [26] Stability changes of dental implants according to the simulated peri-implant bone defects
    Park, Chan-Jin
    Lee, Mi-Ran
    Cho, Lee-Ra
    Yi, Yang-Jin
    Jung, Ho-Nyun
    ASBM7: ADVANCED BIOMATERIALS VII, 2007, 342-343 : 57 - +
  • [27] Quantitative measurement of peri-implant bone defects using optical coherence tomography
    Kim, Sulhee
    Kang, Se-Ryong
    Park, Hee-Jung
    Kim, Bome
    Kim, Tae-Il
    Yi, Won-Jin
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 48 (02): : 84 - 91
  • [28] Early peri-implant bone loss: a prospective cohort study
    Cassetta, M.
    Pranno, N.
    Calasso, S.
    Di Mambro, A.
    Giansanti, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (09) : 1138 - 1145
  • [29] Evaluation of the Effects of Systemic Irisin Application on Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-implant Bone Defects
    Bulmus, Ozgur
    Dundar, Serkan
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Artas, Gokhan
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Canpolat, Sinan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (07) : 2272 - 2275
  • [30] Peri-Implant Bone Damage Procured by Piezoelectric and Conventional Implant Site Preparation: An In Vitro Comparison
    Rebaudi, Alberto
    Rebaudi, Federico
    Barberis, Fabrizio
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    Marenzi, Gaetano
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (24): : 1 - 9