A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Analgosedation Requirements in COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID-19 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Schaller, Alyssa M. [1 ]
Feih, Joel T. [1 ,2 ]
Juul, Janelle J. [1 ]
Rein, Lisa E. [3 ]
Duewell, Brittney E. [1 ]
Makker, Hemanckur [2 ]
机构
[1] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pharm, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
analgesia; sedation; ECMO; COVID-19; ARDS; SEDATION;
D O I
10.1177/08850666241259960
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Reports have described increased sedation requirements in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and for intubated COVID-19 patients. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the analgosedation requirements of COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO compared to non-COVID-19 ECMO patients. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study included adult patients with ARDS requiring venovenous or venopulmonary arterial ECMO admitted to a single intensive care unit from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients were categorized as COVID-19 ECMO or non-COVID-19 ECMO. The primary outcome was median daily dosing of parenteral analgosedative medications. Pertinent secondary outcomes included incidence of extubation or tracheostomy and change in sedation following tracheostomy or addition of oral agents. Results; A total of 109 patients were evaluated; 63 COVID-19 ECMO patients and 46 non-COVID ECMO patients. The primary outcome was statistically higher in the COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 patients for propofol (4131.0 mg vs 2704.8 mg, P < .001), dexmedetomidine (1581.4 mcg vs 1081.3 mcg, P = .016), and parenteral morphine equivalents ([PME], 209.3 mg vs 154.1 mg, P = .027), but only propofol remained significant after adjustment for weight (31.1 mcg/kg/day vs 37.7 mcg/kg/day, P = .014). COVID-19 was significantly associated with increased propofol and PME requirements after adjustment for confounders on linear regression analysis. COVID-19 patients had more days with non-zero dose for propofol (8 days vs 7 days), dexmedetomidine (13 days vs 8.5 days), and PME (17 days vs 8.5 days). The only interventions that were associated with reductions in propofol dose were tracheostomy and antipsychotics. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients on ECMO had significantly longer durations and higher doses of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and parenteral opioids over the first 28 days of cannulation. The only interventions that were associated with statistical reductions in propofol were antipsychotics and tracheostomy.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Incidence of Thrombosis in COVID-19 Patients Compared to Non-COVID-19 Sepsis Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
    Huang, Sherri
    Perry, Ashley
    Parra, Carlos Sanchez
    Torriente, Adriana Gonzalez
    Ghumman, Haider
    Charkowick, Shaun
    Colon, Joshua
    Heide, McKenzi
    Jaglal, Michael
    Mhaskar, Rahul
    Rico, Juan Felipe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [32] Comparison of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 papers
    Candal-Pedreira, Cristina
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    Perez-Rios, Monica
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2022, 36 (06) : 506 - 511
  • [33] Specific sequelae symptoms of COVID-19 of Omicron variant in comparison with non-COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study in Japan
    Omori, Takahiro
    Hanafusa, Mariko
    Kondo, Nobuyuki
    Miyazaki, Yasunari
    Okada, Shusho
    Fujiwara, Takeo
    Kuramochi, Jin
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (05) : 3170 - +
  • [34] COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia: a comparison
    Di Mitri, Chiara
    Arcoleo, Giuseppe
    Mazzuca, Emilia
    Camarda, Gaetana
    Farinella, Enzo Massimo
    Soresi, Maurizio
    Carroccio, Antonio
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (01) : 2321 - 2331
  • [35] Organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation services for COVID-19
    Leow, Lowell
    Papadimas, Evangelos
    Subbian, Senthil K.
    MacLaren, Graeme
    Ramanathan, Kollengode
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2021, 29 (03): : 165 - 169
  • [36] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for COVID-19 in China
    Chenglong Li
    Xiaotong Hou
    Zhaohui Tong
    Haibo Qiu
    Yimin Li
    Ang Li
    Critical Care, 24
  • [37] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Severe COVID-19
    Kon, Zachary N.
    Smith, Deane E.
    Chang, Stephanie H.
    Goldenberg, Ronald M.
    Angel, Luis F.
    Carillo, Julius A.
    Geraci, Travis C.
    Cerfolio, Robert J.
    Montgomery, Robert A.
    Moazami, Nader
    Galloway, Aubrey C.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 111 (02): : 537 - 543
  • [38] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and COVID-19: The causes of failure
    Ahmadi, Zargham Hossein
    Jahangirifard, Alireza
    Farzanegan, Behrooz
    Tabarsi, Payam
    Abtahian, Zahra
    Abedini, Atefeh
    Sharifi, Mehrzad
    Jadbabaei, Amir Naser
    Mafhumi, Yadollah
    Moslem, Ali
    Sistani, Marjan
    Yousefian, Sahar
    Saffaei, Ali
    Dastan, Farzaneh
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (10) : 2838 - 2843
  • [39] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for COVID-19 in China
    Li, Chenglong
    Hou, Xiaotong
    Tong, Zhaohui
    Qiu, Haibo
    Li, Yimin
    Li, Ang
    CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [40] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: Supplementary considerations
    Axiaq, Ariana
    Haiduc, Ana Alina
    Alom, Samiha
    Melamed, Naomi
    Harky, Amer
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (12) : 3673 - 3674