A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Analgosedation Requirements in COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID-19 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Schaller, Alyssa M. [1 ]
Feih, Joel T. [1 ,2 ]
Juul, Janelle J. [1 ]
Rein, Lisa E. [3 ]
Duewell, Brittney E. [1 ]
Makker, Hemanckur [2 ]
机构
[1] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pharm, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
analgesia; sedation; ECMO; COVID-19; ARDS; SEDATION;
D O I
10.1177/08850666241259960
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Reports have described increased sedation requirements in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and for intubated COVID-19 patients. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the analgosedation requirements of COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO compared to non-COVID-19 ECMO patients. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study included adult patients with ARDS requiring venovenous or venopulmonary arterial ECMO admitted to a single intensive care unit from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients were categorized as COVID-19 ECMO or non-COVID-19 ECMO. The primary outcome was median daily dosing of parenteral analgosedative medications. Pertinent secondary outcomes included incidence of extubation or tracheostomy and change in sedation following tracheostomy or addition of oral agents. Results; A total of 109 patients were evaluated; 63 COVID-19 ECMO patients and 46 non-COVID ECMO patients. The primary outcome was statistically higher in the COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 patients for propofol (4131.0 mg vs 2704.8 mg, P < .001), dexmedetomidine (1581.4 mcg vs 1081.3 mcg, P = .016), and parenteral morphine equivalents ([PME], 209.3 mg vs 154.1 mg, P = .027), but only propofol remained significant after adjustment for weight (31.1 mcg/kg/day vs 37.7 mcg/kg/day, P = .014). COVID-19 was significantly associated with increased propofol and PME requirements after adjustment for confounders on linear regression analysis. COVID-19 patients had more days with non-zero dose for propofol (8 days vs 7 days), dexmedetomidine (13 days vs 8.5 days), and PME (17 days vs 8.5 days). The only interventions that were associated with reductions in propofol dose were tracheostomy and antipsychotics. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients on ECMO had significantly longer durations and higher doses of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and parenteral opioids over the first 28 days of cannulation. The only interventions that were associated with statistical reductions in propofol were antipsychotics and tracheostomy.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Inflammation in COVID-19
    Supady, Alexander
    Bode, Christoph
    Duerschmied, Daniel
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2021, 67 (02) : E72 - E73
  • [22] The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19
    Dalia, Adam A.
    Convissar, David
    Crowley, Jerome
    Raz, Yuval
    Funamoto, Masaki
    Wiener-Kronish, Jeanine
    Shelton, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (09) : 3668 - 3675
  • [23] EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION: A HOPE FOR THE SICKEST PATIENTS WITH COVID-19
    Arshad, Aleena
    Yaqoob, Hamid
    Henson, Theresa
    Huang, Lawrence
    Pitaktong, Areen
    Greenberg, Daniel
    Peneyra, Daniel V.
    Epelbaum, Oleg
    Chandy, Dipak
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (04) : 1018A - 1018A
  • [24] Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Obese COVID-19 Patients
    Padhye, A. A.
    Gotur, D. B.
    Tuazon, D. M.
    Zainab, A.
    Suarez, E. E.
    Masud, F.
    MacGillivray, T. E.
    Hsu, S. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 203 (09)
  • [25] EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19: DURATION AND OUTCOMES
    Chaudhary, Sanjay
    Herrmann, Olivia
    Dyson, Amari
    Ghimire, Manoj
    Shrestha, Rabi
    Subedi, Prakriti
    Shrestha, Karun
    Bohman, John
    Guru, Pramod
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 84 - 84
  • [26] Polyuria in COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Rausch, Johannes
    Steinbicker, Andrea U.
    Friedrichson, Benjamin
    Flinspach, Armin N.
    Zacharowski, Kai
    Adam, Elisabeth H.
    Piekarski, Florian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (14)
  • [27] Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare service use for non-COVID-19 patients in Japan: retrospective cohort study
    Yamaguchi, Satoko
    Okada, Akira
    Sunaga, Shinji
    Kurakawa, Kayo Ikeda
    Yamauchi, Toshimasa
    Nangaku, Masaomi
    Kadowaki, Takashi
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [28] Comparative analysis of demographic, clinical, biochemical, and predictors of mortality in COVID-19 and NON-COVID-19 ARDS patients: A retrospective cohort study
    Paulo, Matheus Furlan
    Lago, Alessandra Fabiane
    Bellissimo-Rodrigues, Fernando
    da Silva, Joao Manoel
    Basile-Filho, Anibal
    MEDICINE, 2025, 104 (12)
  • [29] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis
    Abramov, Alexey
    Su, Irene
    Agerstrand, Cara
    Flatley, Meaghan
    Dubois, Richard
    Feldhaus, Danielle
    Stanifer, Bryan P.
    Sonett, Joshua
    Brodie, Daniel
    Lemaitre, Philippe
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (12) : E224 - E229
  • [30] Characteristics of Tracheostomized Patients: COVID-19 Vs Non-COVID-19
    Bahk, J.
    Dolan, B.
    Sharma, V.
    Sehmbhi, M.
    Fung, J. Y.
    Lee, Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207