A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Analgosedation Requirements in COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID-19 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Schaller, Alyssa M. [1 ]
Feih, Joel T. [1 ,2 ]
Juul, Janelle J. [1 ]
Rein, Lisa E. [3 ]
Duewell, Brittney E. [1 ]
Makker, Hemanckur [2 ]
机构
[1] Froedtert & Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pharm, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
analgesia; sedation; ECMO; COVID-19; ARDS; SEDATION;
D O I
10.1177/08850666241259960
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Reports have described increased sedation requirements in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and for intubated COVID-19 patients. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the analgosedation requirements of COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO compared to non-COVID-19 ECMO patients. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study included adult patients with ARDS requiring venovenous or venopulmonary arterial ECMO admitted to a single intensive care unit from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients were categorized as COVID-19 ECMO or non-COVID-19 ECMO. The primary outcome was median daily dosing of parenteral analgosedative medications. Pertinent secondary outcomes included incidence of extubation or tracheostomy and change in sedation following tracheostomy or addition of oral agents. Results; A total of 109 patients were evaluated; 63 COVID-19 ECMO patients and 46 non-COVID ECMO patients. The primary outcome was statistically higher in the COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 patients for propofol (4131.0 mg vs 2704.8 mg, P < .001), dexmedetomidine (1581.4 mcg vs 1081.3 mcg, P = .016), and parenteral morphine equivalents ([PME], 209.3 mg vs 154.1 mg, P = .027), but only propofol remained significant after adjustment for weight (31.1 mcg/kg/day vs 37.7 mcg/kg/day, P = .014). COVID-19 was significantly associated with increased propofol and PME requirements after adjustment for confounders on linear regression analysis. COVID-19 patients had more days with non-zero dose for propofol (8 days vs 7 days), dexmedetomidine (13 days vs 8.5 days), and PME (17 days vs 8.5 days). The only interventions that were associated with reductions in propofol dose were tracheostomy and antipsychotics. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients on ECMO had significantly longer durations and higher doses of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and parenteral opioids over the first 28 days of cannulation. The only interventions that were associated with statistical reductions in propofol were antipsychotics and tracheostomy.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 Patients Require Prolonged Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Survival Compared With Non-COVID-19 Patients
    Russ, Martin
    Menk, Mario
    Graw, Jan Adriaan
    Skrypnikov, Vladimir
    Hunsicker, Oliver
    Rudat, Kathleen
    Weber-Carstens, Steffen
    Francis, Roland C. E.
    Pickerodt, Philipp A.
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2022, 4 (04) : E0671
  • [2] Outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients
    Kurihara, Chitaru
    Manerikar, Adwaiy
    Gao, Catherine Aiyuan
    Watanabe, Satoshi
    Kandula, Viswajit
    Klonis, Alexandra
    Hoppner, Vanessa
    Karim, Azad
    Saine, Mark
    Odell, David D.
    Lung, Kalvin
    Garza-Castillon, Rafael
    Kim, Samuel S.
    Walter, James McCauley
    Wunderink, Richard G.
    Budinger, G. R. Scott
    Bharat, Ankit
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (04) : 688 - 696
  • [3] CISATRACURIUM DOSING REQUIREMENTS IN COVID-19 COMPARED TO NON-COVID-19 PATIENTS
    Ingebrigtson, Megan
    Farina, Nicholas
    Miller, James
    Renius, Karl
    Kenes, Michael
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 128 - 128
  • [4] Cisatracurium Dosing Requirements in COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID-19 Patients
    Ingebrigtson, Megan
    Farina, Nicholas
    Miller, James
    Renius, Karl
    McSparron, Jakob I.
    Kenes, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 36 (03) : 485 - 486
  • [5] POST-DECANNULATION ANALGOSEDATION WEANING IN COVID-19 EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION PATIENTS
    Schaller, Alyssa
    Feih, Joel
    Juul, Janelle
    Makker, Hemanckur
    Duewell, Brittney
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 75 - 75
  • [6] EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS AT A QUATERNARY CENTER
    Yaqoob, Hamid
    Arshad, Aleena
    Greenberg, Daniel
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    Peneyra, Daniel
    Epelbaum, Oleg
    Chandy, Dipak
    CHEST, 2021, 160 (04) : 1146A - 1147A
  • [7] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With COVID-19
    Sreenivasan, Jayakumar
    Ranka, Sagar
    Lahan, Shubham
    Abu-Haniyeh, Ahmed
    Li, Heyi
    Kaul, Risheek
    Malik, Aaqib
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    Frishman, William H.
    Lansman, Steven
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2022, 30 (03) : 129 - 133
  • [8] COVID-19 outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure vs historical cohort of non-COVID-19 viral infections
    Dave, Sagar B.
    Rabinowitz, Ronald
    Shah, Aakash
    Tabatabai, Ali
    Galvagno, Samuel M., Jr.
    Mazzeffi, Michael A.
    Rector, Raymond
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    Scalea, Thomas M.
    Menaker, Jay
    PERFUSION-UK, 2023, 38 (06): : 1165 - 1173
  • [9] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19
    Tisminetzky, Manuel
    Ferreyro, Bruno L.
    Fan, Eddy
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2022, 38 (03) : 535 - 552
  • [10] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19
    Sanford, Zachary
    Madathil, Ronson J.
    Deatrick, Kristopher B.
    Tabatabai, Ali
    Menaker, Jay
    Galvagno, Samuel M.
    Mazzeffi, Michael A.
    Rabin, Joseph
    Ghoreishi, Mehrdad
    Rector, Raymond
    Herr, Daniel L.
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 15 (04) : 306 - 313