Clinical implementation and evaluation of deep learning-assisted automatic radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Ningyu [1 ]
Fan, Jiawei [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xu, Yingjie [1 ]
Yan, Lingling [1 ]
Chen, Deqi [1 ]
Wang, Wenqing [1 ]
Men, Kuo [1 ]
Dai, Jianrong [1 ]
Liu, Zhiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Clin Res Ctr Radiat Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Key Lab Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Automatic planning; Deep learning; VMAT; Expert review; Lung cancer; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE PREDICTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104492
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the clinical application of deep learning (DL)-assisted automatic radiotherapy planning for lung cancer. Methods: A DL model was developed for predicting patient-specific doses, trained and validated on a dataset of 235 patients with diverse target volumes and prescriptions. The model was integrated into clinical workflow with DL-predicted objective functions. The automatic plans were retrospectively designed for additional 50 treated manual volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. A comparison was made between automatic and manual plans in terms of dosimetric indexes, monitor units (MUs) and planning time. Plan quality metric (PQM) encompassing these indexes was evaluated, with higher PQM values indicating superior plan quality. Qualitative evaluations of two plans were conducted by four reviewers. Results: The PQM score was 40.7 f 13.1 for manual plans and 40.8 f 13.5 for automatic plans (P = 0.75). Compared to manual plans, the targets coverage and homogeneity of automatic plans demonstrated no significant difference. Manual plans exhibited better sparing for lung in V5 (difference: 1.8 f 4.2 %, P = 0.02), whereas automatic plans showed enhanced sparing for heart in V30 (difference: 1.4 f 4.7 %, P = 0.02) and for spinal cord in Dmax (difference: 0.7 f 4.7 Gy, P = 0.04). The planning time and MUs of automatic plans were significantly reduced by 70.5 f 20.0 min and 97.4 f 82.1. Automatic plans were deemed acceptable in 88 % of the reviews (176/200). Conclusions: The DL-assisted approach for lung cancer notably decreased planning time and MUs, while demonstrating comparable or superior quality relative to manual plans. It has the potential to provide benefit to lung cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep learning-assisted colonoscopy images for prediction of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer
    Cai, Yue
    Chen, Xijie
    Chen, Junguo
    Liao, James
    Han, Ming
    Lin, Dezheng
    Hong, Xiaoling
    Hu, Huabin
    Hu, Jiancong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (02): : 859 - 867
  • [42] AN INNOVATIVE LEARNING TOOL FOR RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLAN EVALUATION: IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION
    Adleman, Jenna
    Winter, Jeff
    McNiven, Andrea
    Croke, Jennifer
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 : S33 - S33
  • [43] An Innovative Learning Tool for Radiotherapy Treatment Plan Evaluation: Implementation and Evaluation
    Adleman, J.
    Winter, J.
    McNiven, A. L.
    Croke, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : S15 - S15
  • [44] AUTOMATIC TREATMENT PLAN GENERATION FOR PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY USING DEEP LEARNING
    Church, Cody
    Yap, Michelle
    Dal Granville
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186 : S48 - S49
  • [45] What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer?
    Ekberg, L
    Holmberg, O
    Wittgren, L
    Bjelkengren, G
    Landberg, T
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 48 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [46] Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of lung and liver cancer - a clinical comparison of two treatment planning systems
    Bogner, J
    Dvorak, P
    Kroupa, B
    Dieckmann, K
    Georg, D
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S45 - S45
  • [47] Clinical Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Segmentation of Nodal Clinical Target Volumes in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
    Buelens, P.
    Willems, S.
    Vandewinckele, L.
    Crijns, W.
    Maes, F.
    Weltens, C. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S101 - S102
  • [48] Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System Simulation Lung Cancer Application
    Sebaaly, Anthony
    Bassile, Corinne
    Akl, Tamara
    Farha, Georges
    El Barouky, Jad
    Azoury, Fares
    Rihana, Sandy
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY (IMCET), 2018,
  • [49] Design, Implementation, and Clinical Impact of a Machine Learning-Assisted Intervention Bundle to Improve Opioid Prescribing
    Marwaha, Jayson S.
    Beaulieu-Jones, Brendin R.
    Kennedy, Chris J.
    Nathanson, Larry A.
    Robinson, Kortney
    Tandon, Manu
    Brat, Gabriel A.
    NEJM CATALYST INNOVATIONS IN CARE DELIVERY, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [50] Clinical implementation of automated treatment planning for whole-brain radiotherapy
    Han, Eun Young
    Cardenas, Carlos E.
    Nguyen, Callistus
    Hancock, Donald
    Xiao, Yao
    Mumme, Raymond
    Court, Laurence E.
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Netherton, Tucker J.
    Li, Jing
    Yeboa, Debra Nana
    Wang, Chenyang
    Briere, Tina M.
    Balter, Peter
    Martel, Mary K.
    Wen, Zhifei
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (09): : 94 - 102