Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Capuani, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Maiuro, Alessandra [1 ,3 ]
Giampa, Emiliano [4 ]
Montuori, Marco [1 ]
Varrucciu, Viviana [5 ]
Hagberg, Gisela E. [6 ]
Vinicola, Vincenzo [4 ]
Colonna, Sergio [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, CNR ISC, Phys Dept, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Neuroimaging Lab, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Phys Dept, Pzle Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS Rome, Rehabil Hosp, Santa Lucia Fdn, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[5] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Radiol Dept, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[6] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
MRI; low magnetic field; high magnetic field; spongy bone; bone marrow fat; SINGLE-SIDED NMR; HIGH-RESOLUTION MRI; TRABECULAR BONE; MARROW FAT; LOW-FIELD; CANCELLOUS BONE; VOLUME FRACTION; HUMAN BRAIN; OSTEOPOROSIS; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14101050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a growing interest in bone tissue MRI and an even greater interest in using low-cost MR scanners. However, the characteristics of bone MRI remain to be fully defined, especially at low field strength. This study aimed to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), T2, and T2* in spongy bone at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. Furthermore, relaxation times were characterized as a function of bone-marrow lipid/water ratio content and trabecular bone density. Methods: Thirty-two women in total underwent an MR-imaging investigation of the calcaneus at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. MR-spectroscopy was performed at 3.0 T to assess the fat/water ratio. SNR, T2, and T2* were quantified in distinct calcaneal regions (ST, TC, and CC). ANOVA and Pearson correlation statistics were used. Results: SNR increase depends on the magnetic field strength, acquisition sequence, and calcaneal location. T2* was different at 3.0 T and 1.5 T in ST, TC, and CC. Relaxation times decrease as much as the magnetic field strength increases. The significant linear correlation between relaxation times and fat/water found in healthy young is lost in osteoporotic subjects. Conclusion: The results have implications for the possible use of relaxation vs. lipid/water marrow content for bone quality assessment and the development of quantitative MRI diagnostics at low field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Orthodontic springs and auxiliary appliances: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance systems
    J. Kemper
    A. N. Priest
    D. Schulze
    B. Kahl-Nieke
    G. Adam
    A. Klocke
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 533 - 540
  • [42] K-T sense-accelerated myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Comparison with 1.5 Tesla
    Schwitter, J.
    Kozerke, S.
    Maredia, N.
    Suerder, D.
    Greenwood, J. P.
    Boesiger, P.
    Plein, S.
    HEART, 2008, 94 : A82 - A83
  • [43] Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T - Comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T
    Liu, Xin
    Bi, Xiaoming
    Huang, Jie
    Jerecic, Renate
    Carr, James
    Li, Debiao
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (09) : 663 - 668
  • [44] Carotid plaque morphology and composition: Initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths
    Underhill, Hunter R.
    Yarnykh, Vasily L.
    Hatsukami, Thomas S.
    Wang, Jinnan
    Balu, Niranjan
    Hayes, Cecil E.
    Oikawa, Minako
    Yu, Wei
    Xu, Dongxiang
    Chu, Baocheng
    Wyman, Bradley T.
    Polissar, Nayak L.
    Yuan, Chun
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (02) : 550 - 560
  • [45] A Prospective Comparison Between 1.5t Magnetic Resonance and 3t Magnetic Resonance in Ileo-Colonic Crohn's Disease: A Single Center Experience
    Fiorino, Gionata
    Bonifacio, Crisitana
    Padrenostro, Mauro
    Sposta, Federica Mrakic
    Balzarini, Luca
    Repici, Alessandro
    Malesci, Alberto
    Danese, Silvio
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S695 - S695
  • [46] Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Perianal Crohn's Disease at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Feasibility Study
    Alyami, Ali
    Hoad, Caroline L.
    Tench, Christopher
    Bannur, Uday
    Clarke, Christopher
    Latief, Khalid
    Argyriou, Konstantinos
    Lobo, Alan
    Lung, Philip
    Baldwin-Cleland, Rachel
    Sahnan, Kapil
    Hart, Ailsa
    Limdi, Jimmy K.
    Mclaughlin, John
    Atkinson, David
    Parker, Geoffrey J. M.
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Little, Ross A.
    Gowland, Penny A.
    Moran, Gordon W.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [47] Unexpectedly Smaller Artifacts of 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging than 1.5 T: Recommendation of 3.0-T Scanners for Patients with Magnet-Resistant Adjustable Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Devices
    Amano, Yuki
    Kuroda, Naoto
    Uchida, Daiki
    Sakakura, Yuya
    Nakatogawa, Hirokazu
    Ando, Naoto
    Nakayama, Teiji
    Sato, Haruhiko
    Masui, Takayuki
    Sameshima, Tetsuro
    Tanaka, Tokutaro
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 130 : E393 - E399
  • [48] Evaluation of the diagnostic utility on 1.5T and 3.0T 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy for temporal lobe epilepsy
    Biao Qu
    Hejuan Tan
    Min Xiao
    Dongbao Liu
    Shijin Wang
    Yiwen Zhang
    Runhan Chen
    Gaofeng Zheng
    Yonggui Yang
    Gen Yan
    Xiaobo Qu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [49] Evaluation of the diagnostic utility on 1.5T and 3.0T 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy for temporal lobe epilepsy
    Qu, Biao
    Tan, Hejuan
    Xiao, Min
    Liu, Dongbao
    Wang, Shijin
    Zhang, Yiwen
    Chen, Runhan
    Zheng, Gaofeng
    Yang, Yonggui
    Yan, Gen
    Qu, Xiaobo
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [50] Comparison of Different Thoracic Aortic Wall Characteristics for Assessment of Disease Activity in Takayasu Arteritis: A Quantitative Study with 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhang, Nan
    Pan, Lili
    Liu, Jiayi
    Li, Yu
    Xu, Lei
    Sun, Zhonghua
    Wang, Zhenchang
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (03)