Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Capuani, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Maiuro, Alessandra [1 ,3 ]
Giampa, Emiliano [4 ]
Montuori, Marco [1 ]
Varrucciu, Viviana [5 ]
Hagberg, Gisela E. [6 ]
Vinicola, Vincenzo [4 ]
Colonna, Sergio [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, CNR ISC, Phys Dept, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Neuroimaging Lab, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Phys Dept, Pzle Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS Rome, Rehabil Hosp, Santa Lucia Fdn, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[5] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Radiol Dept, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[6] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
MRI; low magnetic field; high magnetic field; spongy bone; bone marrow fat; SINGLE-SIDED NMR; HIGH-RESOLUTION MRI; TRABECULAR BONE; MARROW FAT; LOW-FIELD; CANCELLOUS BONE; VOLUME FRACTION; HUMAN BRAIN; OSTEOPOROSIS; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14101050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a growing interest in bone tissue MRI and an even greater interest in using low-cost MR scanners. However, the characteristics of bone MRI remain to be fully defined, especially at low field strength. This study aimed to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), T2, and T2* in spongy bone at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. Furthermore, relaxation times were characterized as a function of bone-marrow lipid/water ratio content and trabecular bone density. Methods: Thirty-two women in total underwent an MR-imaging investigation of the calcaneus at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. MR-spectroscopy was performed at 3.0 T to assess the fat/water ratio. SNR, T2, and T2* were quantified in distinct calcaneal regions (ST, TC, and CC). ANOVA and Pearson correlation statistics were used. Results: SNR increase depends on the magnetic field strength, acquisition sequence, and calcaneal location. T2* was different at 3.0 T and 1.5 T in ST, TC, and CC. Relaxation times decrease as much as the magnetic field strength increases. The significant linear correlation between relaxation times and fat/water found in healthy young is lost in osteoporotic subjects. Conclusion: The results have implications for the possible use of relaxation vs. lipid/water marrow content for bone quality assessment and the development of quantitative MRI diagnostics at low field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancement of abdominal organs on hepatic arterial phase: quantitative comparison between 1.5-and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging
    Goncalves Neto, Jose A.
    Altun, Ersan
    Elazzazi, Mohamed
    Vaidean, Georgeta D.
    Chaney, Matthew
    Semelka, Richard C.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 28 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [22] Comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI for the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders
    Bourgioti, Charis
    Zafeiropoulou, Konstantina
    Tzavara, Chara
    Daskalakis, George
    Fotopoulos, Stavros
    Theodora, Marianna
    Nikolaidou, Maria Evangelia
    Konidari, Marianna
    Gourtsoyianni, Sofia
    Panourgias, Evangelia
    Koutoulidis, Vassilis
    Martzoukos, Epameinondas Anastasios
    Konstantinidou, Anastasia Evangelia
    Moulopoulos, Lia Angela
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (09) : 408 - 417
  • [23] Comparison Between the Diagnostic Performance of 1.5 T and 3.0 T field Strengths for Detecting Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Magnetic Resonance Black-Blood Thrombus Imaging
    Ye, Yufeng
    He, Xueping
    Huang, Chen
    Shi, Caiyun
    Deng, Wei
    Luo, Wenfeng
    Liang, Jianke
    He, Zhuonan
    Mao, Huan
    Liang, Qiwei
    Chen, Dongya
    Chen, Hanwei
    Xie, Guoxi
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2020, 26
  • [24] Assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging
    Kizilgoz, Volkan
    Sivrioglu, Ali Kemal
    Aydin, Hasan
    Cetin, Turkhun
    Ulusoy, Gokhan Ragip
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (04) : 1486 - 1495
  • [25] Routine clinical knee MR reports: comparison of diagnostic performance at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for assessment of the articular cartilage
    Jacob C. Mandell
    Jeffrey A. Rhodes
    Nehal Shah
    Glenn C. Gaviola
    Andreas H. Gomoll
    Stacy E. Smith
    Skeletal Radiology, 2017, 46 : 1487 - 1498
  • [26] Routine clinical knee MR reports: comparison of diagnostic performance at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for assessment of the articular cartilage
    Mandell, Jacob C.
    Rhodes, Jeffrey A.
    Shah, Nehal
    Gaviola, Glenn C.
    Gomoll, Andreas H.
    Smith, Stacy E.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (11) : 1487 - 1498
  • [27] NODDI reproducibility and variability with magnetic field strength: A comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T
    Chung, Ai Wern
    Seunarine, Kiran K.
    Clark, Chris A.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2016, 37 (12) : 4550 - 4565
  • [28] Scan-rescan and intra-observer variability of magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Vidal, Arvin
    Bureau, Yves
    Wade, Trevor
    Spence, J. David
    Rutt, Brian K.
    Fenster, Aaron
    Parraga, Grace
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (23): : 6821 - 6835
  • [29] Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of benign prostatic tissue: findings at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T-initial experience
    Chitkara, Munish
    Westphalen, Antonio
    Kurhanewicz, John
    Qayyum, Aliya
    Poder, Liina
    Reed, Galen
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2011, 35 (04) : 288 - 293
  • [30] Effect of 1.5-T and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging on the ceramic adhesion and physical properties of prosthetic substructures
    Baysal, Nurten
    Ayyildiz, Simel
    Orujalipoor, Ilghar
    Erol, Baris Filiz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06): : 809.e1 - 809.e7