Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Capuani, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Maiuro, Alessandra [1 ,3 ]
Giampa, Emiliano [4 ]
Montuori, Marco [1 ]
Varrucciu, Viviana [5 ]
Hagberg, Gisela E. [6 ]
Vinicola, Vincenzo [4 ]
Colonna, Sergio [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, CNR ISC, Phys Dept, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Neuroimaging Lab, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Phys Dept, Pzle Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS Rome, Rehabil Hosp, Santa Lucia Fdn, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[5] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Radiol Dept, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[6] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
MRI; low magnetic field; high magnetic field; spongy bone; bone marrow fat; SINGLE-SIDED NMR; HIGH-RESOLUTION MRI; TRABECULAR BONE; MARROW FAT; LOW-FIELD; CANCELLOUS BONE; VOLUME FRACTION; HUMAN BRAIN; OSTEOPOROSIS; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14101050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a growing interest in bone tissue MRI and an even greater interest in using low-cost MR scanners. However, the characteristics of bone MRI remain to be fully defined, especially at low field strength. This study aimed to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), T2, and T2* in spongy bone at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. Furthermore, relaxation times were characterized as a function of bone-marrow lipid/water ratio content and trabecular bone density. Methods: Thirty-two women in total underwent an MR-imaging investigation of the calcaneus at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. MR-spectroscopy was performed at 3.0 T to assess the fat/water ratio. SNR, T2, and T2* were quantified in distinct calcaneal regions (ST, TC, and CC). ANOVA and Pearson correlation statistics were used. Results: SNR increase depends on the magnetic field strength, acquisition sequence, and calcaneal location. T2* was different at 3.0 T and 1.5 T in ST, TC, and CC. Relaxation times decrease as much as the magnetic field strength increases. The significant linear correlation between relaxation times and fat/water found in healthy young is lost in osteoporotic subjects. Conclusion: The results have implications for the possible use of relaxation vs. lipid/water marrow content for bone quality assessment and the development of quantitative MRI diagnostics at low field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Serrao, Eva M.
    Kessler, Dimitri A.
    Carmo, Bruno
    Beer, Lucian
    Brindle, Kevin M.
    Buonincontri, Guido
    Gallagher, Ferdia A.
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Godfrey, Edmund
    Graves, Martin J.
    McLean, Mary A.
    Sala, Evis
    Schulte, Rolf F.
    Kaggie, Joshua D.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [2] Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the pancreas at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Eva M. Serrao
    Dimitri A. Kessler
    Bruno Carmo
    Lucian Beer
    Kevin M. Brindle
    Guido Buonincontri
    Ferdia A. Gallagher
    Fiona J. Gilbert
    Edmund Godfrey
    Martin J. Graves
    Mary A. McLean
    Evis Sala
    Rolf F. Schulte
    Joshua D. Kaggie
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [3] Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T:: Comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging
    Krüger, G
    Kastrup, A
    Glover, GH
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (04) : 595 - 604
  • [4] Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the human calf - Comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T - Preliminary results
    Saupe, Nadia
    White, Lawrence M.
    Sussman, Marshall S.
    Kassner, Andrea
    Tomlinson, George
    Noseworthy, Michael D.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (09) : 612 - 618
  • [5] Pancreatic Duct in Autoimmune Pancreatitis Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Pancreatography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, Myung-Hwan
    Lee, Sung Koo
    Kim, Song Cheol
    Kim, Hyoung Jung
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    PANCREAS, 2017, 46 (07) : 921 - 926
  • [6] Comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T for Contrast-Enhanced Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Angiography
    Londy, Frank Joseph
    Lowe, Suzan
    Stein, Paul D.
    Weg, John G.
    Eisner, Robert L.
    Leeper, Kenneth V.
    Woodard, Pamela K.
    Sostman, H. Dirk
    Jablonski, Kathleen A.
    Fowler, Sarah E.
    Hales, Charles A.
    Hull, Russell D.
    Gottschalk, Alexander
    Naidich, David P.
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2012, 18 (02) : 134 - 139
  • [7] COMPARISON OF MULTIMODAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING UTILIZING 1.5 T AND 3.0 T IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME AT THE TIME OF FIRST RECURRENCE
    Ronan, Lara Kunschner
    Eskey, Clifford
    Hampton, Thomas
    Fadul, Camilo
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 15 : 199 - 199
  • [8] Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 5.0 T: quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3.0 T
    Yin, Liang
    Li, Zhangzhu
    Shang, Mingyan
    Li, Zongchang
    Tang, Bowen
    Yu, Dan
    Gan, Jie
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [9] The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Xiaodan Li
    Rui Chen
    Xi Xu
    Zebin Xiao
    Xiaoyu Wei
    Yuelong Yang
    Zhongping Zhang
    Zhigang Wu
    Yanjie Zhu
    Hui Liu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [10] The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Li, Xiaodan
    Chen, Rui
    Xu, Xi
    Xiao, Zebin
    Wei, Xiaoyu
    Yang, Yuelong
    Zhang, Zhongping
    Wu, Zhigang
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Liu, Hui
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)