Covariate adjustment and estimation of difference in proportions in randomized clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Jialuo [1 ]
Xi, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Gilead Sci, Dept Biostat, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
关键词
binary outcome; covariate adjustment; difference in proportions; risk difference; sandwich formula; variance estimation; BINARY OUTCOMES; REGRESSION; CONSISTENT; VARIANCES;
D O I
10.1002/pst.2397
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Difference in proportions is frequently used to measure treatment effect for binary outcomes in randomized clinical trials. The estimation of difference in proportions can be assisted by adjusting for prognostic baseline covariates to enhance precision and bolster statistical power. Standardization or g-computation is a widely used method for covariate adjustment in estimating unconditional difference in proportions, because of its robustness to model misspecification. Various inference methods have been proposed to quantify the uncertainty and confidence intervals based on large-sample theories. However, their performances under small sample sizes and model misspecification have not been comprehensively evaluated. We propose an alternative approach to estimate the unconditional variance of the standardization estimator based on the robust sandwich estimator to further enhance the finite sample performance. Extensive simulations are provided to demonstrate the performances of the proposed method, spanning a wide range of sample sizes, randomization ratios, and model specification. We apply the proposed method in a real data example to illustrate the practical utility.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 905
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SEQUENTIAL MONITORING OF COVARIATE-ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
    Zhu, Hongjian
    Hu, Feifang
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2019, 29 (01) : 265 - 282
  • [42] The impact of misclassification on covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials
    Wang, Tong
    Ma, Wei
    BIOMETRICS, 2021, 77 (02) : 451 - 464
  • [43] Robust extraction of covariate information to improve estimation efficiency in randomized trials
    Moore, Kelly L.
    Neugebauer, Romain
    Valappil, Thamban
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (19) : 2389 - 2408
  • [44] Covariate adjustment increased power in randomized controlled trials: an example in traumatic brain injury
    Turner, Elizabeth L.
    Perel, Pablo
    Clayton, Tim
    Edwards, Phil
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    Roberts, Ian
    Shakur, Haleema
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (05) : 474 - 481
  • [45] A Simulation-Based Comparison of Covariate Adjustment Methods for the Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chausse, Pierre
    Liu, Jin
    Luta, George
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (04):
  • [46] Adjustment for Baseline Characteristics in Randomized Clinical Trials
    Holmberg, Mathias J.
    Andersen, Larsw.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (21): : 2155 - 2156
  • [47] Redressing the balance Covariate adjustment in randomised trials
    Kahan, Brennan C.
    Morris, Tim P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (10) : 1573 - 1573
  • [48] Robust variance estimation for covariate-adjusted unconditional treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with binary outcomes
    Ye, Ting
    Bannick, Marlena
    Yi, Yanyao
    Shao, Jun
    STATISTICAL THEORY AND RELATED FIELDS, 2023, 7 (02) : 159 - 163
  • [49] Dichotomizing a Continuous Baseline Covariate in Randomized Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes
    Zhang, Boan
    Lin, Yunzhi
    Su, Zheng
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2014, 43 (02) : 390 - 399
  • [50] The impact of covariate imbalance on the size of the logrank test in randomized clinical trials
    Kinukawa, N
    Nakamura, T
    Akazawa, K
    Nose, Y
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (15) : 1955 - 1967