Covariate adjustment and estimation of difference in proportions in randomized clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Jialuo [1 ]
Xi, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Gilead Sci, Dept Biostat, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
关键词
binary outcome; covariate adjustment; difference in proportions; risk difference; sandwich formula; variance estimation; BINARY OUTCOMES; REGRESSION; CONSISTENT; VARIANCES;
D O I
10.1002/pst.2397
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Difference in proportions is frequently used to measure treatment effect for binary outcomes in randomized clinical trials. The estimation of difference in proportions can be assisted by adjusting for prognostic baseline covariates to enhance precision and bolster statistical power. Standardization or g-computation is a widely used method for covariate adjustment in estimating unconditional difference in proportions, because of its robustness to model misspecification. Various inference methods have been proposed to quantify the uncertainty and confidence intervals based on large-sample theories. However, their performances under small sample sizes and model misspecification have not been comprehensively evaluated. We propose an alternative approach to estimate the unconditional variance of the standardization estimator based on the robust sandwich estimator to further enhance the finite sample performance. Extensive simulations are provided to demonstrate the performances of the proposed method, spanning a wide range of sample sizes, randomization ratios, and model specification. We apply the proposed method in a real data example to illustrate the practical utility.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 905
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of covariate adjustment approaches under model misspecification in individually randomized trials
    Tackney, Mia S.
    Morris, Tim
    White, Ian
    Leyrat, Clemence
    Diaz-Ordaz, Karla
    Williamson, Elizabeth
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [32] Current Issues with Covariate Adjustment in the Analysis of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials
    Alemayehu, Demissie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 18 (02) : 153 - 157
  • [33] A comparison of covariate adjustment approaches under model misspecification in individually randomized trials
    Mia S. Tackney
    Tim Morris
    Ian White
    Clemence Leyrat
    Karla Diaz-Ordaz
    Elizabeth Williamson
    Trials, 24
  • [34] Covariate Adjustment in Heart Failure Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials: A Case Analysis of the HF-ACTION Trial
    O'Connor, Christopher M.
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Whellan, David J.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2011, 7 (04) : 497 - +
  • [35] Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: A principled yet flexible approach
    Tsiatis, Anastasios A.
    Davidian, Marie
    Zhang, Min
    Lu, Xiaomin
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (23) : 4658 - 4677
  • [36] Covariate adjustment had similar benefits in small and large randomized controlled trials
    Thompson, Douglas D.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Whiteley, William N.
    Murray, Gordon D.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (09) : 1068 - 1075
  • [37] Covariate adjustment in ramdomized trials with binary outcomes: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation
    Moore, K. L.
    van der Laan, M. J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (01) : 39 - 64
  • [38] Testing Hypotheses of Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials
    Ma, We
    Hu, Feifang
    Zhang, Lixin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 110 (510) : 669 - 680
  • [39] On the covariate-adjusted estimation for an overall treatment difference with data from a randomized comparative clinical trial
    Tian, Lu
    Cai, Tianxi
    Zhao, Lihui
    Wei, Lee-Jen
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2012, 13 (02) : 256 - 273
  • [40] EFFECT OF COVARIATE MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS
    MORGAN, TM
    ELASHOFF, RM
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (01) : 31 - 41