Fitting the Bartlett–Lewis rainfall model using Approximate Bayesian Computation

被引:4
|
作者
Aryal N.R. [1 ]
Jones O.D. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne
[2] School of Mathematics, Cardiff University
来源
Aryal, Nanda R. (naryal@student.unimelb.edu.au) | 1600年 / Elsevier B.V.卷 / 175期
关键词
Approximate Bayesian Computation; Bartlett–Lewis process; Generalised method of moments; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Rainfall; Simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.matcom.2019.10.018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Bartlett–Lewis (BL) rainfall model is a stochastic model for the rainfall at a single point in space, constructed using a cluster point process. The cluster process is constructed by taking a primary/parent process, called the storm arrival process in our context, and then attaching to each storm point a finite secondary/daughter point process, called a cell arrival process. To each cell arrival point we then attach a rain cell, with an associated rainfall duration and intensity. The total rainfall at time t is then the sum of the intensities from all active cells at that time. Because it has an intractable likelihood function, in the past the BL model has been fitted using the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM). The purpose of this paper is to show that Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) can also be used to fit this model, and moreover that it gives a better fit than GMM. GMM fitting matches theoretical and observed moments of the process, and thus is restricted to moments for which you have an analytic expression. ABC fitting compares the observed process to simulations, and thus places no restrictions on the statistics used to compare them. The penalty we pay for this increased flexibility is an increase in computational time. © 2019 International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS)
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Approximate Bayesian computation methods
    Celeux, Gilles
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2012, 22 (06) : 1165 - 1166
  • [42] Correcting Approximate Bayesian Computation
    Templeton, Alan R.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (09) : 488 - 489
  • [43] Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation
    Beaumont, Mark A.
    Cornuet, Jean-Marie
    Marin, Jean-Michel
    Robert, Christian P.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2009, 96 (04) : 983 - 990
  • [44] Approximate Bayesian Computation for Smoothing
    Martin, James S.
    Jasra, Ajay
    Singh, Sumeetpal S.
    Whiteley, Nick
    Del Moral, Pierre
    McCoy, Emma
    STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, 32 (03) : 397 - 420
  • [45] Multifidelity Approximate Bayesian Computation
    Prescott, Thomas P.
    Baker, Ruth E.
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2020, 8 (01): : 114 - 138
  • [46] Hierarchical Approximate Bayesian Computation
    Turner, Brandon M.
    Van Zandt, Trisha
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2014, 79 (02) : 185 - 209
  • [47] Approximate Bayesian computation and MCMC
    Plagnol, V
    Tavaré, S
    MONTE CARLO AND QUASI-MONTE CARLO METHODS 2002, 2004, : 99 - 113
  • [48] Handbook of Approximate Bayesian Computation
    Franks, Jordan J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (532) : 2100 - 2101
  • [49] A tutorial on approximate Bayesian computation
    Turner, Brandon M.
    Van Zandt, Trisha
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 56 (02) : 69 - 85
  • [50] An Introduction to Approximate Bayesian Computation
    Nguyen, Hien D.
    STATISTICS AND DATA SCIENCE, RSSDS 2019, 2019, 1150 : 96 - 108