Topological regression as an interpretable and efficient tool for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Ruibo [1 ]
Nolte, Daniel [1 ]
Sanchez-Villalobos, Cesar [1 ]
Ghosh, Souparno [2 ]
Pal, Ranadip [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Stat, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PREDICTION; CLASSIFICATION; VISUALIZATION; GRAPHS;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-024-49372-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is a powerful tool for drug discovery, yet the lack of interpretability of commonly used QSAR models hinders their application in molecular design. We propose a similarity-based regression framework, topological regression (TR), that offers a statistically grounded, computationally fast, and interpretable technique to predict drug responses. We compare the predictive performance of TR on 530 ChEMBL human target activity datasets against the predictive performance of deep-learning-based QSAR models. Our results suggest that our sparse TR model can achieve equal, if not better, performance than the deep learning-based QSAR models and provide better intuitive interpretation by extracting an approximate isometry between the chemical space of the drugs and their activity space. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models are widely used in drug discovery, but have limitations in their interpretability and accuracy near activity cliffs. Here the authors use a topological regression framework to increase QSAR interpretability and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Modeling Predictions of In Vitro Mutagenicity
    Charlebois, M.
    Kulkarni, S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2015, 56 : S86 - S86
  • [32] Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of triaminotriazine drugs based on Heuristic Method
    Liu, Kunping
    Xia, Binbin
    Ma, Weiping
    Zheng, Bo
    Zhang, Xiaoyun
    Fan, Botao
    QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2008, 27 (04): : 425 - 431
  • [33] Evaluation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling Strategies: Local and Global Models
    Helgee, Ernst Ahlberg
    Carlsson, Lars
    Boyer, Scott
    Norinder, Ulf
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2010, 50 (04) : 677 - 689
  • [34] ON THE QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP IN DRUG RESEARCH
    TRINAJSTIC, N
    RANDIC, M
    KLEIN, DJ
    ACTA PHARMACEUTICA JUGOSLAVICA, 1986, 36 (02): : 267 - 279
  • [35] Structure Activity Relationship and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships Modeling of Antitrypanosomal Activities of Alkyldiamine Cryptolepine Derivatives
    Belaidi, Salah
    Salah, Toufik
    Melkemi, Nadjib
    Sinha, Leena
    Prasad, Onkar
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL NANOSCIENCE, 2015, 12 (09) : 2421 - 2427
  • [36] REINVESTIGATION OF A NONADDITIVE QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP
    CAMMARATA, A
    BUSTARD, TM
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1974, 17 (09) : 981 - 985
  • [37] DESCRIPTOR TOPOLOGICAL MODEL FOR ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP
    KUZMIN, VE
    VITYUK, NV
    POZIGUN, VV
    KHIMIKO-FARMATSEVTICHESKII ZHURNAL, 1989, 23 (05): : 605 - 607
  • [38] Quantitative structure-activity relationship model validation
    Eriksson, L
    Johansson, E
    Wold, S
    QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - VII, 1997, : 381 - 397
  • [39] A PRACTICAL OVERVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP
    Nantasenamat, Chanin
    Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, Chartchalerm
    Naenna, Thanakorn
    Prachayasittikul, Virapong
    EXCLI JOURNAL, 2009, 8 : 74 - 88
  • [40] QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP AND DRUG DESIGN
    FUJITA, T
    NIPPON NOGEIKAGAKU KAISHI-JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND AGROCHEMISTRY, 1990, 64 (01): : 1 - 11