Topological regression as an interpretable and efficient tool for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Ruibo [1 ]
Nolte, Daniel [1 ]
Sanchez-Villalobos, Cesar [1 ]
Ghosh, Souparno [2 ]
Pal, Ranadip [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Stat, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PREDICTION; CLASSIFICATION; VISUALIZATION; GRAPHS;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-024-49372-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is a powerful tool for drug discovery, yet the lack of interpretability of commonly used QSAR models hinders their application in molecular design. We propose a similarity-based regression framework, topological regression (TR), that offers a statistically grounded, computationally fast, and interpretable technique to predict drug responses. We compare the predictive performance of TR on 530 ChEMBL human target activity datasets against the predictive performance of deep-learning-based QSAR models. Our results suggest that our sparse TR model can achieve equal, if not better, performance than the deep learning-based QSAR models and provide better intuitive interpretation by extracting an approximate isometry between the chemical space of the drugs and their activity space. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models are widely used in drug discovery, but have limitations in their interpretability and accuracy near activity cliffs. Here the authors use a topological regression framework to increase QSAR interpretability and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transductive Ridge Regression in Structure-activity Modeling
    Marcou, Gilles
    Delouis, Grace
    Mokshyna, Olena
    Horvath, Dragos
    Lachiche, Nicolas
    Varnek, Alexandre
    MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2018, 37 (1-2)
  • [22] Structure-based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of estrogen receptor β-ligands
    Dong, Xialan
    Hilliard, Solomon G.
    Zheng, Weifan
    FUTURE MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 3 (08) : 933 - 945
  • [23] Building Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models Using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees
    Feng, Dai
    Syetnik, Vladimir
    Liaw, Andy
    Pratola, Matthew
    Sheridan, Robert P.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2019, 59 (06) : 2642 - 2655
  • [24] To model the quantitative structure-activity relationship of drug with adapting partial least square regression
    Yan, XF
    Chen, DZ
    Hu, SX
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 30 (05) : 536 - 539
  • [25] Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship (QSAR) Modelling of Indomethacin Derivatives using Regression Analysis
    Shukla, Neerja
    Sharma, Bechan
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 31 (40) : 6722 - 6732
  • [26] Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling of Rat Acute Toxicity by Oral Exposure
    Zhu, Hao
    Martin, Todd M.
    Ye, Lin
    Sedykh, Alexander
    Young, Douglas M.
    Tropsha, Alexander
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 22 (12) : 1913 - 1921
  • [27] 4D-quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling: making a comeback
    Fourches, Denis
    Ash, Jeremy
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2019, 14 (12) : 1227 - 1235
  • [28] COMP 254-Workflows based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling
    Dogra, Shaillay Kumar
    Hariharan, Ramesh
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234
  • [29] Local and global quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling and prediction for the baseline toxicity
    Yuan, Hua
    Wang, Yongyan
    Cheng, Yiyu
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (01) : 159 - 169
  • [30] Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of mosquito repellents using calculated descriptors
    Natarajan, Ramanathan
    Basak, Subhash C.
    Mills, Denise
    Kraker, Jessica J.
    Hawkins, Douglas M.
    CROATICA CHEMICA ACTA, 2008, 81 (02) : 333 - 340