Barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an eating disorder

被引:2
|
作者
Nimbley, Emy [1 ,2 ]
Maloney, Ellen [1 ,2 ]
Buchan, Kyle [1 ,2 ]
Sader, Michelle [2 ,3 ]
Gillespie-Smith, Karri [1 ,2 ]
Duffy, Fiona [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Social Sci, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Eating Disorders & Autism Collaborat EDAC, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med Med Sci & Nutr, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
ANOREXIA-NERVOSA; TRAITS; ADULTS; MEN;
D O I
10.1186/s40337-024-01076-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundCo-production is the collaboration between researchers and the lived experience community in designing, conducting and sharing research. The importance of co-production is increasingly advocated in both the autism and eating disorder fields. Despite this, there remains a lack of clarity at how to define, apply and conduct ethical co-production. Understanding common challenges and what we can do to overcome these challenges are integral to ensuring ethical and meaningful research with Autistic people with an eating disorder. The current study therefore explored: What are the barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an ED?MethodsFive workshops were conducted with 30 collaborators exploring barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production. Synchronous (online workshops) and asynchronous (offline discussion forum) data was analysed using thematic analysis. Themes were co-produced by a neurotypical and Autistic researcher with lived/living experience of an eating disorder.ResultsFour themes were identified that explored barriers to ethical co-production: unequal partnerships, the inaccessibility of research, excluded by diagnoses and communication differences. Three themes were identified with regards to facilitators of ethical co-production: shared power (with sub-themes relationships, not roles and creative compensation), clarity and transparency and autism-affirming approaches.DiscussionConducting ethical co-production with Autistic people with eating disorders has the potential to generate meaningful research that can be translated into improving the lives of the Autistic and eating disorder community. To achieve this, co-production teams should strive towards shared power and long-term relationships, adapting for communication differences and preferences and operating firmly within an autism-affirming framework. It is hoped that study findings will inspire collaboration, discussion and novel, translatable research. Co-production is the collaboration between researchers and the lived experience community in designing, conducting and sharing research. This study brought together Autistic people with lived/living experience of an eating disorder (ED), researchers, clinicians, third sector organisations and parents/carers to understand what the barriers (challenges) and facilitators (how to overcome these challenges) were to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an eating disorder. Common barriers were found to be unequal partnerships, difficulty accessing research, feeling or being excluded by a reliance on diagnoses and the impact of communication differences. Facilitators were felt to be a shared power dynamic, focusing on establishing relationships not just tokenistic roles and creating fair and person-centred compensation. Facilitators were also adapting for communication differences and moving away from harmful medicalised and ableists models, towards autism-affirming practice. It is hoped that the study will encourage discussion and positive co-production relationships between autism and ED researchers and the Autistic and ED community. It is also hoped that that this approach will lead to more meaningful research that will ultimately improve the lives of Autistic people with an ED.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A strategic partnership approach to enabling co-production of integrated care for older people
    Mulligan, Des
    McGuigan, Catherine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 18
  • [42] Reflections and recommendations on respectful co-production of social marketing research with Indigenous people
    Cateriano-Arevalo, Erik
    Soria Gonzales , Jorge
    Soria Gonzales , Richard
    Paiva Pinedo , Nestor
    Gordon, Ross
    Pesantes, Maria Amalia
    Schuster, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MARKETING, 2025, 15 (01) : 59 - 85
  • [43] Co-production in scholarly activity: Valuing the social capital of lay people and volunteers
    Fenge, Lee-Ann
    Fannin, Ann
    Hicks, Christina
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2012, 12 (05) : 545 - 559
  • [44] CREATIVITY AND CO-PRODUCTION TO SUPPORT PEOPLE LIVING WITH CHRONIC PAIN WITH THEIR MENTAL HEALTH
    Campbell, L.
    Callaghan, P.
    Chew-Graham, C. A.
    Dziedzic, K.
    Evans, N.
    Kingstone, T.
    Group, L.
    Stevenson, K.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 7 - 7
  • [45] Co-production and engagement of people with dementia: The issue of ethics and creative or intellectual copyright
    Swaffer, Kate
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 15 (06): : 1319 - 1325
  • [46] EMPOWERMENT OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY THROUGH CO-PRODUCTION
    Kreinbucher-Bekerle, C.
    Sattler, M. C.
    Jobst, M.
    Perkounig, T.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 829 - 830
  • [47] Listening to children and young people: an Educational Psychology Service co-production journey
    Boswell, Naomi
    Douglas-Osborn, Erica
    Halkyard, Taylor
    Woods, Kevin
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 37 (04) : 396 - 412
  • [48] Facilitators of and barriers to buprenorphine initiation for people with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: protocol for a scoping review
    Bozinoff, Nikki
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Rodak, Terri
    Bucago, Christine
    Kingston, Katie
    Klaiman, Michelle
    Poynter, Brittany
    Samuels, Glenna
    Schoenfeld, Elizabeth
    Shelton, Dominick
    Kalocsai, Csilla
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [49] Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Use of Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Care: A Commentary on Linardon et al. (2025)
    Sharp, Gemma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2025,
  • [50] ICT-enabled co-production of public services: Barriers and enablers. A systematic review
    Clifton, Judith
    Diaz Fuentes, Daniel
    Llamosas Garcia, Gonzalo
    INFORMATION POLITY, 2020, 25 (01) : 25 - 48