Barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an eating disorder

被引:2
|
作者
Nimbley, Emy [1 ,2 ]
Maloney, Ellen [1 ,2 ]
Buchan, Kyle [1 ,2 ]
Sader, Michelle [2 ,3 ]
Gillespie-Smith, Karri [1 ,2 ]
Duffy, Fiona [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Social Sci, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Eating Disorders & Autism Collaborat EDAC, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med Med Sci & Nutr, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
ANOREXIA-NERVOSA; TRAITS; ADULTS; MEN;
D O I
10.1186/s40337-024-01076-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundCo-production is the collaboration between researchers and the lived experience community in designing, conducting and sharing research. The importance of co-production is increasingly advocated in both the autism and eating disorder fields. Despite this, there remains a lack of clarity at how to define, apply and conduct ethical co-production. Understanding common challenges and what we can do to overcome these challenges are integral to ensuring ethical and meaningful research with Autistic people with an eating disorder. The current study therefore explored: What are the barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an ED?MethodsFive workshops were conducted with 30 collaborators exploring barriers and facilitators to ethical co-production. Synchronous (online workshops) and asynchronous (offline discussion forum) data was analysed using thematic analysis. Themes were co-produced by a neurotypical and Autistic researcher with lived/living experience of an eating disorder.ResultsFour themes were identified that explored barriers to ethical co-production: unequal partnerships, the inaccessibility of research, excluded by diagnoses and communication differences. Three themes were identified with regards to facilitators of ethical co-production: shared power (with sub-themes relationships, not roles and creative compensation), clarity and transparency and autism-affirming approaches.DiscussionConducting ethical co-production with Autistic people with eating disorders has the potential to generate meaningful research that can be translated into improving the lives of the Autistic and eating disorder community. To achieve this, co-production teams should strive towards shared power and long-term relationships, adapting for communication differences and preferences and operating firmly within an autism-affirming framework. It is hoped that study findings will inspire collaboration, discussion and novel, translatable research. Co-production is the collaboration between researchers and the lived experience community in designing, conducting and sharing research. This study brought together Autistic people with lived/living experience of an eating disorder (ED), researchers, clinicians, third sector organisations and parents/carers to understand what the barriers (challenges) and facilitators (how to overcome these challenges) were to ethical co-production with Autistic people with an eating disorder. Common barriers were found to be unequal partnerships, difficulty accessing research, feeling or being excluded by a reliance on diagnoses and the impact of communication differences. Facilitators were felt to be a shared power dynamic, focusing on establishing relationships not just tokenistic roles and creating fair and person-centred compensation. Facilitators were also adapting for communication differences and moving away from harmful medicalised and ableists models, towards autism-affirming practice. It is hoped that the study will encourage discussion and positive co-production relationships between autism and ED researchers and the Autistic and ED community. It is also hoped that that this approach will lead to more meaningful research that will ultimately improve the lives of Autistic people with an ED.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making
    Briley, Laura
    Brown, Daniel
    Kalafatis, Scott E.
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 9 : 41 - 49
  • [22] Overcoming barriers to knowledge co-production in academic-practitioner research collaboration
    McCabe, Angela
    Parker, Rachel
    Osegowitsch, Tom
    Cox, Stephen
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 41 (02) : 212 - 222
  • [23] Barriers and Opportunities for Actionable Knowledge Production in Drought Risk Management: Embracing the Frontiers of Co-production
    Grainger, Sam
    Murphy, Conor
    Vicente-Serrano, Sergio M.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [24] Co-production with vulnerable people: an exploratory study in mental health care
    Brandsen, Taco
    Honingh, Marlies
    Kruyen, Peter
    van Geffen, Marieke
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 26 (08) : 2452 - 2470
  • [25] Co-production in mental health research: reflections from the People Study
    Pinfold, Vanessa
    Szymczynska, Paulina
    Hamilton, Sarah
    Peacocke, Richard
    Dean, Shirley
    Clewett, Naomi
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Larsen, John
    MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (04) : 220 - 231
  • [26] Co-production and the provision of lifelong learning policy for elderly people in Thailand
    Dhirathiti, Nopraenue Sajjarax
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 21 (07) : 1011 - 1028
  • [27] Barriers and Facilitators to Harm Reduction for Opioid Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study of People With Lived Experience
    Westafer, Lauren M.
    Beck, Samantha A.
    Simon, Caty
    Potee, Benjamin
    Soares, William E.
    Schoenfeld, Elizabeth M.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 83 (04) : 340 - 350
  • [28] Facilitators of and Barriers to BuprenorphineNaloxone Initiation for People With Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review
    Bozinoff, Nikki
    Grennell, Erin
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Bucago, Christine
    Rodak, Terri
    Klaiman, Michelle
    Poynter, Brittany
    Shelton, Dominick
    Schoenfeld, Elizabeth
    Kalocsai, Csilla
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2024, 260
  • [29] Co-creation, Co-design, and Co-production: Enablers and Barriers for Implementation and Use of Digital Technologies
    Contreras-Espinosa, R. S.
    Frisiello, A.
    Eguia-Gomez, J. L.
    Blanco, A.
    COMMUNICATION AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, ICOMTA 2022, 2023, 318 : 81 - 90
  • [30] Ethical sensitivity in co-production: Openness and doubt when young women participate in research
    Groven, Karen Synne
    Svendby, Ellen Berg
    Rugseth, Gro
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 41 (04) : 445 - 460