Prognostic analysis of peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Takasaki, Kazuki [1 ]
Ichinose, Takayuki [1 ]
Nishida, Haruka [1 ]
Miyagawa, Yuko [1 ]
Hashimoto, Kei [1 ]
Watanabe, Saya [1 ]
Takahashi, Yuko [1 ]
Hirano, Mana [1 ]
Hiraike, Haruko [1 ]
Sasajima, Yuko [2 ]
Nagasaka, Kazunori [1 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kaga 2-11-1,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Kaga 2-11-1,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
关键词
Interval debulking surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Peritoneal washing cytology; Prognosis; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-024-01494-1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a treatment option for advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal surgery is required for better survival; however, while peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) has been identified as a prognostic factor, its comprehensive assessment during IDS remains unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate PWC efficacy during IDS, alongside other factors including residual disease and the modeled cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of 25 patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS between January 2017 to June 2023. Results Twelve (48.0%) patients were PWC-positive, and the remainder were PWC-negative. PWC was performed at laparotomy during IDS, after which five (41.7%) PWC-positive and four (30.8%) PWC-negative patients received bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, for maintenance treatment. Four (33.3%) PWC-positive and 10 (76.9%) PWC-negative patients received poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. In patients who received bevacizumab and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, overall survival and progression-free survival did not significantly differ between those who were PWC-positive and PWC-negative (p = 0.27 and 0.20, respectively). Progression-free survival significantly differed between those with favorable and unfavorable CA-125 KELIM (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis indicated that optimal surgery and favorable CA-125 KELIM were associated with better progression-free survival (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively), with only optimal surgery associated with better overall survival (p = 0.04). Conclusions A positive PWC at IDS was not associated with survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Our findings indicate that although PWC status at IDS should be one of the factors determining survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recent improvements in maintenance therapy may make the combination of CA-125 KELIM and PWC status a more useful prognostic factor in selecting treatment after IDS. Further studies are needed to validate these results, highlighting the potential importance of maintenance treatment after IDS and the need for further research to validate the clinical significance of a positive PWC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Diaphragmatic Surgery During Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy An Analysis of 74 Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Tsolakidis, Dimitris
    Amant, Frederic
    Van Gorp, Toon
    Leunen, Karin
    Neven, Patrick
    Vergote, Ignace
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (04) : 542 - 551
  • [42] The prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in ovarian cancer
    Simojoki, M
    Santala, M
    Vuopala, S
    Kauppila, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 20 (5-6) : 357 - 360
  • [43] Timing of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Vergote, I.
    van Gorp, T.
    Amant, F.
    Leunen, K.
    Neven, P.
    Berteloot, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 : 11 - 19
  • [44] Interval debulking surgery by robotic approach in ovarian cancer
    Exposito, Carlos Ortega
    Guevara, Rodrigo
    Marti, Lola
    Barahona, Marc
    Fernandez, Sergi
    Torrejon, Juan Carlos
    Pardo, Beatriz
    Gil, Marta
    Perlaza, Maria Pilar
    Perez, Samuel
    Castilla, Mireia
    Alemany, Judit
    Canizares, Alvaro
    Ponce, Jordi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_1) : A342 - A342
  • [45] Differences in Patterns of Recurrence Between Primary and Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Mitsopoulos, Vasileios
    Innamaa, Anni
    Lippiatt, Jonathan
    Collins, Sarah
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (04) : 2003 - 2008
  • [46] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer, an alternative with multiple advantages
    Medina-Franco, Heriberto
    Mejia-Fernandez, Loreli
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (06)
  • [47] Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Jorgensen, Kirsten
    Melamed, Alexander
    Wu, Chi-Fang
    Nitecki, Roni
    Pareja, Rene
    Fagotti, Anna
    Schorge, John O.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    -Hain, Jose Alejandro Rauh
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 172 : 130 - 137
  • [48] Operative morbidity following primary and interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.
    Rose, PG
    Nerenston, S
    Brady, MF
    Clarke-Pearson, D
    Olt, G
    Rubin, SC
    Moore, DH
    Small, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 451S - 451S
  • [49] Nomogram to predict feasibility of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Conte, Carmine
    Rosati, Andrea
    Marchetti, Claudia
    Iacobelli, Valentina
    Quagliozzi, Lorena
    Gallucci, Valeria
    Alletti, Salvatore Gueli
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fagotti, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (04) : 532 - 539
  • [50] IS LAPAROSCOPIC INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY ACHIEVABLE FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY?
    Pellerin, M.
    Lecointre, L.
    Billard-Martel, C.
    Boisrame, T.
    Faller, E.
    Fabacher, T.
    Akladios, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A271 - A271