Prognostic analysis of peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Takasaki, Kazuki [1 ]
Ichinose, Takayuki [1 ]
Nishida, Haruka [1 ]
Miyagawa, Yuko [1 ]
Hashimoto, Kei [1 ]
Watanabe, Saya [1 ]
Takahashi, Yuko [1 ]
Hirano, Mana [1 ]
Hiraike, Haruko [1 ]
Sasajima, Yuko [2 ]
Nagasaka, Kazunori [1 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kaga 2-11-1,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Kaga 2-11-1,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
关键词
Interval debulking surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Peritoneal washing cytology; Prognosis; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-024-01494-1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a treatment option for advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal surgery is required for better survival; however, while peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) has been identified as a prognostic factor, its comprehensive assessment during IDS remains unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate PWC efficacy during IDS, alongside other factors including residual disease and the modeled cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of 25 patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS between January 2017 to June 2023. Results Twelve (48.0%) patients were PWC-positive, and the remainder were PWC-negative. PWC was performed at laparotomy during IDS, after which five (41.7%) PWC-positive and four (30.8%) PWC-negative patients received bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, for maintenance treatment. Four (33.3%) PWC-positive and 10 (76.9%) PWC-negative patients received poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. In patients who received bevacizumab and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, overall survival and progression-free survival did not significantly differ between those who were PWC-positive and PWC-negative (p = 0.27 and 0.20, respectively). Progression-free survival significantly differed between those with favorable and unfavorable CA-125 KELIM (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis indicated that optimal surgery and favorable CA-125 KELIM were associated with better progression-free survival (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively), with only optimal surgery associated with better overall survival (p = 0.04). Conclusions A positive PWC at IDS was not associated with survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Our findings indicate that although PWC status at IDS should be one of the factors determining survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recent improvements in maintenance therapy may make the combination of CA-125 KELIM and PWC status a more useful prognostic factor in selecting treatment after IDS. Further studies are needed to validate these results, highlighting the potential importance of maintenance treatment after IDS and the need for further research to validate the clinical significance of a positive PWC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Primary versus Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Results from a Prospective Analysis
    Sehouli, J.
    Savvatis, K.
    Braicu, E-I
    Schmidt, S. -C.
    Lichtenegger, W.
    Fotopoulou, C.
    ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 33 : 112 - 112
  • [22] Prognostic value of peritoneal lavage cytology and chemotherapy during surgery for advanced gastric cancer
    Funami, Y
    Tokumoto, N
    Miyauchi, H
    Ochiai, T
    Kuga, K
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 1999, 84 (03) : 220 - 224
  • [23] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A Cochrane systematic review
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (01) : 257 - 264
  • [24] Multifactorial impact on the outcome of interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancers
    Jiang, Qing-xiu
    Jiang, Yu-xia
    Wang, Xuan
    Luo, Shu-juan
    Zhou, Rong
    Hua Linghu
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 495 : 148 - 153
  • [25] The role of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Menderes, Gulden
    Black, Jonathan D.
    Azodi, Masoud
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (09) : 899 - 901
  • [26] Primary Surgery or Interval Debulking for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Does It Matter?
    Markauskas, Algirdas
    Mogensen, Ole
    Christensen, Rene dePont
    Jensen, Pernille Tine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (08) : 1420 - 1428
  • [27] Laparoscopic interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Jorgensen, K.
    Melamed, A.
    Bradford, L.
    Wang, V.
    Chang, H.
    Rauh-Hain, J. A.
    Schorge, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 49 - 50
  • [28] Do surgeons overestimate diaphragmatic peritoneal disease in interval debulking surgery of ovarian cancer?
    Turrel, Estelle
    Chopin, Nicolas
    Meeus, Pierre
    Blache, Anna
    Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
    Tredan, Olivier
    Treilleux, Isabelle
    Ebring, Coralie
    Heinemann, Mellie
    Rossi, Lea
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (09):
  • [29] Debulking Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Interval or at the End of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    F. Cantu-de Leon, D.
    Gallardo-Alvarado, L.
    Salcedo-Hernandez, R.
    Ramirez, R.
    Perez-Montiel, D.
    Onate-Ocana, L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S86 - S86
  • [30] Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: yet to be defined?
    Stoeckle, Eberhard
    Boubli, Benjamin
    Floquet, Anne
    Brouste, Veronique
    Sire, Marie
    Croce, Sabrina
    Thomas, Laurence
    Guyon, Frederic
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 159 (02) : 407 - 412