Prognostic analysis of peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Takasaki, Kazuki [1 ]
Ichinose, Takayuki [1 ]
Nishida, Haruka [1 ]
Miyagawa, Yuko [1 ]
Hashimoto, Kei [1 ]
Watanabe, Saya [1 ]
Takahashi, Yuko [1 ]
Hirano, Mana [1 ]
Hiraike, Haruko [1 ]
Sasajima, Yuko [2 ]
Nagasaka, Kazunori [1 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kaga 2-11-1,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Kaga 2-11-1,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
关键词
Interval debulking surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Peritoneal washing cytology; Prognosis; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-024-01494-1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a treatment option for advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal surgery is required for better survival; however, while peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) has been identified as a prognostic factor, its comprehensive assessment during IDS remains unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate PWC efficacy during IDS, alongside other factors including residual disease and the modeled cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of 25 patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS between January 2017 to June 2023. Results Twelve (48.0%) patients were PWC-positive, and the remainder were PWC-negative. PWC was performed at laparotomy during IDS, after which five (41.7%) PWC-positive and four (30.8%) PWC-negative patients received bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, for maintenance treatment. Four (33.3%) PWC-positive and 10 (76.9%) PWC-negative patients received poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. In patients who received bevacizumab and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, overall survival and progression-free survival did not significantly differ between those who were PWC-positive and PWC-negative (p = 0.27 and 0.20, respectively). Progression-free survival significantly differed between those with favorable and unfavorable CA-125 KELIM (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis indicated that optimal surgery and favorable CA-125 KELIM were associated with better progression-free survival (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively), with only optimal surgery associated with better overall survival (p = 0.04). Conclusions A positive PWC at IDS was not associated with survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Our findings indicate that although PWC status at IDS should be one of the factors determining survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recent improvements in maintenance therapy may make the combination of CA-125 KELIM and PWC status a more useful prognostic factor in selecting treatment after IDS. Further studies are needed to validate these results, highlighting the potential importance of maintenance treatment after IDS and the need for further research to validate the clinical significance of a positive PWC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of peritoneal cytology in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients at interval debulking surgery
    Kato, K.
    Omatsu, K.
    Nomura, H.
    Matoda, M.
    Matsuura, M.
    Katsuda, T.
    Okamoto, S.
    Kondo, E.
    Kanao, H.
    Utsugi, K.
    Sugiyama, Y.
    Takeshima, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 : 741 - 741
  • [2] Negative peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery predicts overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer
    Iura, Ayaka
    Takita, Morihito
    Kawano, Aiko
    Imai, Kazuaki
    Konnai, Katsuyuki
    Onose, Ryo
    Kato, Hisamori
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (05)
  • [3] Is there a correlation of positive peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery on the survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Douligeris, Athanasios
    Pergialiotis, Vasilios
    Fasoulakis, Zacharias
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Haidopoulos, Dimitrios
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (01)
  • [4] POSITIVE PERITONEAL CYTOLOGY AT THE TIME OF INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY IS HIGHLY PREDICTIVE OF PROGNOSIS IN ADVANCED-STAGE OVARIAN CANCER
    Kato, K.
    Omatsu, K.
    Usami, T.
    Taniguchi, T.
    Yamamoto, A.
    Ushioda, N.
    Nomura, H.
    Matoda, M.
    Okamoto, S.
    Kondo, E.
    Umayahara, K.
    Takeshima, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 66 - 66
  • [5] Interval from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: Is this a prognostic indicator?
    Hariprasad, R.
    Kumar, L.
    Mookerjee, A.
    Radhakrishnan, V.
    Kumar, S.
    Mathur, S.
    Thulkar, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [6] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Bryant, Andrew
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (01):
  • [7] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04):
  • [8] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [9] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Bryant, Andrew
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04):
  • [10] Interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Pecorelli, S
    Odicino, F
    Favalli, G
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04): : 573 - 583