Using machine learning models to predict falls in hospitalised adults

被引:0
|
作者
Jahandideh, S. [1 ]
Hutchinson, A. F. [1 ,2 ]
Bucknall, T. K. [1 ,3 ]
Considine, J. [1 ,4 ]
Driscoll, A. [1 ]
Manias, E. [1 ]
Phillips, N. M. [1 ]
Rasmussen, B. [1 ,5 ]
Vos, N. [6 ]
Hutchinson, A. M. [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, Vic, Australia
[3] Alfred Hlth, Prahran, Vic, Australia
[4] Eastern Hlth, Box Hill, Vic, Australia
[5] Western Hlth, Sunshine, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Hlth, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[7] Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[8] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
关键词
Electronic health records; Decision making; Machine learning; Random forest; Deep neural network; Fall prediction; Health service;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105436
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Identifying patients at high risk of falling is crucial in implementing effective fall prevention programs. While the integration of information systems is becoming more widespread in the healthcare industry, it poses a significant challenge in analysing vast amounts of data to identify factors that could enhance patient safety. Objective: To determine fall-associated factors and develop high-performance prediction tools for at-risk patients in acute and sub-acute care services in Australia. Methods: A retrospective study of 672,400 patients admitted to acute and sub-acute care services within a large metropolitan tertiary health service in Victoria, Australia, between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. Data were obtained from four sources: the Department of Health Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset, RiskMan TM , electronic health records, and the health workforce dataset. Machine learning techniques, including Random Forest and Deep Neural Network models, were used to analyse the data, predict patient falls, and identify the most important risk factors for falls in this population. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1 -score, precision, recall, specificity, Matthew 's correlation coefficient, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The deep neural network and random forest models were highly accurate in predicting hospital patient falls. The deep neural network model achieved an accuracy of 0.988 and a specificity of 0.999, while the RF achieved an accuracy of 0.989 and a specificity of 1.000. The top 20 variables impacting falls were compared across both models, and 12 common factors were identified. These factors can be broadly classified into three categories: patient-related factors, staffing-related factors, and admission-related factors. Although not all factors are modifiable, they must be considered when planning fall prevention interventions. Conclusion: The study demonstrated machine learning 's potential to predict falls and identify key risk factors. Further validation across diverse populations and settings is essential for broader applicability.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage
    Young, Roger C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (01): : 194 - 195
  • [22] Machine Learning Models to Predict Google Stock Prices
    Bucura, Cosmina Elena
    Giudici, Paolo
    ALGORITHMS, 2025, 18 (02)
  • [23] Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage
    Venkatesh, Kartik K.
    Strauss, Robert A.
    Grotegut, Chad A.
    Heine, R. Philip
    Chescheir, Nancy C.
    Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Menard, Katherine M.
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (04): : 935 - 944
  • [24] Benchmarking machine learning models to predict corporate bankruptcy
    Alanis, Emmanuel
    Chava, Sudheer
    Shah, Agam
    JOURNAL OF CREDIT RISK, 2023, 19 (02): : 77 - 110
  • [25] Hypocalcemia and Machine Learning Models to Predict Trauma Mortality
    Limon, David
    Moreira, Alvaro
    Myers, John C.
    Jenkins, Donald H.
    Braverman, Maxwell
    Barry, Lauran A.
    Lumbard, Derek C.
    Smith, Alison
    Nicholson, Susannah E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S550 - S550
  • [26] Different Machine Learning Models to predict dropouts in MOOCs
    Kashyap, Avinash
    Nayak, Ashalatha
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2018, : 80 - 85
  • [27] Machine learning models predict selinexor tolerability and efficacy
    Artstein, Y.
    Walker, C.
    Yang, F.
    Van Domelen, D.
    Borochov, D.
    Mercier, I.
    Shah, J.
    Shacham, S.
    Landesman, Y.
    Tang, S.
    Shacham, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S277 - S277
  • [28] Machine Learning Models to Predict Multiclass Protein Classifications
    Parikh, Yash
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 300 - 304
  • [29] Comparison of Machine Learning Models to Predict Twitter Buzz
    Parikh, Yash
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 69 - 73
  • [30] Pruned Machine Learning Models to Predict Aqueous Solubility
    Perryman, Alexander L.
    Inoyama, Daigo
    Patel, Jimmy S.
    Ekins, Sean
    Freundlich, Joel S.
    ACS OMEGA, 2020, 5 (27): : 16562 - 16567