Regional variation in health care substitution for intrauterine device insertion: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Vink, Maarten D. [1 ,2 ]
Portrait, France R. [1 ]
van Wezep, Tim [3 ]
Koolman, Xander [1 ]
Mol, Ben W. [4 ]
van der Hijden, Eric J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Talma Inst, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Hlth Econ, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Maatweg 3, NL-3813 TZ Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Vektis, Sparrenheuvel 18, NL-3708 JE Zeist, Netherlands
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[5] Zilveren Kruis Achmea, Handelsweg 2, NL-3707 NH Zeist, Netherlands
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Care substitution; IUD insertion; Medical practice variation; Contraception; Cohort study;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-024-02546-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments. Methods All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months. Results Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01). Conclusions IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at >= 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Continuation of copper and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices: a retrospective cohort study
    Phillips, Sharon J.
    Hofler, Lisa G.
    Modest, Anna M.
    Harvey, Lara F. B.
    Wu, Lily H.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 57.e1 - 57.e6
  • [42] Ease of removal of malpositioned intrauterine devices: A retrospective cohort study
    Frisse, Ann C.
    Louik, Jay B.
    Kachwala, Isha A.
    Wu, Haotian
    Felix, Nicole
    Vorawandthanachai, Thammatat
    Avila, Karina
    Benfield, Nerys C.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 137
  • [43] Route to heart failure diagnosis in English primary care: a retrospective cohort study of variation
    Kim, Dani
    Hayhoe, Benedict
    Aylin, Paul
    Majeed, Azeem
    Cowie, Martin R.
    Bottle, Alex
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (687): : E697 - E705
  • [44] Efficacy and Satisfaction Rate in Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion: A Prospective Study
    Iftikhar, Pulwasha M.
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Arora, Ena
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [45] IMMEDIATE POSTABORTAL INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTION - DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY
    GOLDSMIT.A
    GOLDBERG, R
    LIZANA, L
    EYZAGUIR.H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1972, 112 (07) : 957 - &
  • [46] Organizational barriers to the availability and insertion of intrauterine devices in Primary Health Care Services
    Silva Gonzaga, Vanderlea Aparecida
    Vilela Borges, Ana Luiza
    dos Santos, Osmara Alves
    Ferreira Santa Rosa, Patricia Lima
    Sena Goncalves, Renata Ferreira
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2017, 51
  • [47] POSTPLACENTAL LEVONORGESTREL AND COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE INSERTION AFTER VAGINAL DELIVERY AND EXPULSION BY 12 WEEKS POSTPARTUM: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Goldthwaite, L.
    Hyer, J.
    Sheeder, J.
    Tocce, K.
    Teal, S.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (04) : 387 - 387
  • [48] Re: Underuse and Overuse of Osteoporosis Screening in a Regional Health System: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Robert Ferrari
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 155 - 155
  • [49] Re: Underuse and Overuse of Osteoporosis Screening in a Regional Health System: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Ferrari, Robert
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (02) : 155 - 155
  • [50] Health services utilization of patients with vertigo in primary care: a retrospective cohort study
    Grill, Eva
    Strupp, Michael
    Mueller, Martin
    Jahn, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 (08) : 1492 - 1498