Regional variation in health care substitution for intrauterine device insertion: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Vink, Maarten D. [1 ,2 ]
Portrait, France R. [1 ]
van Wezep, Tim [3 ]
Koolman, Xander [1 ]
Mol, Ben W. [4 ]
van der Hijden, Eric J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Talma Inst, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Hlth Econ, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Maatweg 3, NL-3813 TZ Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Vektis, Sparrenheuvel 18, NL-3708 JE Zeist, Netherlands
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[5] Zilveren Kruis Achmea, Handelsweg 2, NL-3707 NH Zeist, Netherlands
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Care substitution; IUD insertion; Medical practice variation; Contraception; Cohort study;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-024-02546-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments. Methods All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months. Results Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01). Conclusions IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at >= 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Timings of insertion and complications among intrauterine copper device users; A prospective cohort study
    Irshad, Samina
    Bari, Arifa
    Qazi, Wardah Ajaz
    Pervaiz, Sanna
    Irshad, Shamim
    Irshad, Nasim
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (03): : 731 - 734
  • [12] Models of care for intrauterine device insertion in primary care: a rapid review
    Moloney, Lauren
    James, Sharon
    Mazza, Danielle
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2021, 27 (04) : XXXIV - XXXV
  • [13] Intrauterine Device Insertion Before and After Mandated Health Care Coverage The Importance of Baseline Costs
    Heisel, Erica
    Kolenic, Giselle E.
    Moniz, Michelle M.
    Kobernik, Emily K.
    Minadeo, Leah
    Kamdar, Neil S.
    Dalton, Vanessa K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (05): : 843 - 849
  • [14] Intrauterine contraceptive device insertion simulation training in primary care
    Ng, Lai Peng
    Koh, Eileen Yi Ling
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2018, 27 (04) : 229 - 233
  • [15] Effect of the Affordable Care Act on the Cost of Intrauterine Device Insertion
    McCarthy, H. Catherine
    Howard, Brandon
    Eid, Sherrine
    Strachan, Gordon
    Tang, Boxiong
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 116S - 117S
  • [16] A prospective cohort study of pain with intrauterine device insertion among women with and without vaginal deliveries
    Allen, R. H.
    Carey, M. S.
    Raker, C.
    Goyal, V.
    Matteson, K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [17] Design of the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study: a multisite retrospective cohort study
    Anthony, Mary S.
    Reed, Susan D.
    Armstrong, Mary Anne
    Getahun, Darios
    Gatz, Jennifer L.
    Saltus, Catherine W.
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Schoendorf, Juliane
    Postlethwaite, Debbie A.
    Raine-Bennett, Tina
    Fassett, Michael J.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Ritchey, Mary E.
    Ichikawa, Laura E.
    Lynen, Richard
    Alabaster, Amy L.
    Merchant, Maqdooda
    Chiu, Vicki Y.
    Shi, Jiaxiao M.
    Xie, Fagen
    Hui, Siu L.
    Wang, Jinyi
    Hunter, Shannon
    Bartsch, Jennifer
    Frenz, Ann-Kathrin
    Chillemi, Giulia
    Im, Theresa M.
    Takhar, Harpreet S.
    Asiimwe, Alex
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : 599.e1 - 599.e18
  • [18] 90-Day Bleeding Patterns After Intrauterine Device Insertion A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study
    Nippita, Siripanth
    Velasco, Margarita G.
    Oviedo, Johana D.
    Westhoff, Carolyn L.
    Davis, Anne R.
    Castano, Paula M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 12S - 12S
  • [19] Outcomes of intrauterine device insertion training for doctors working in primary care
    Stewart, Mary
    Digiusto, Erol
    Bateson, Deborah
    South, Rebecca
    Black, Kirsten I.
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2016, 45 (11) : 837 - 841
  • [20] A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device
    Hinz, Erica K.
    Murthy, Amitasrigowri
    Wang, Binhuan
    Ryan, Nessa
    Ades, Veronica
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (02) : 101 - 105