Regional variation in health care substitution for intrauterine device insertion: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Vink, Maarten D. [1 ,2 ]
Portrait, France R. [1 ]
van Wezep, Tim [3 ]
Koolman, Xander [1 ]
Mol, Ben W. [4 ]
van der Hijden, Eric J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Talma Inst, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Hlth Econ, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Maatweg 3, NL-3813 TZ Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Vektis, Sparrenheuvel 18, NL-3708 JE Zeist, Netherlands
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[5] Zilveren Kruis Achmea, Handelsweg 2, NL-3707 NH Zeist, Netherlands
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Care substitution; IUD insertion; Medical practice variation; Contraception; Cohort study;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-024-02546-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments. Methods All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months. Results Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01). Conclusions IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at >= 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study
    Bayer, Lisa L.
    Jensen, Jeffrey T.
    Li, Hong
    Nichols, Mark D.
    Bednarek, Paula H.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (05) : 443 - 451
  • [2] Experience with intrauterine device insertion in never sexually active adolescents: a retrospective cohort study
    Kebodeaux, Chelsea A.
    Schwartz, Beth I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (06) : 600.e1 - 600.e7
  • [3] The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study
    Perkins, Elena
    Federspiel, Jerome
    Bhattacharya, Deeya
    de los Reyes, Samantha
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 139
  • [4] THE ASSOCIATION OF INSERTION METHODS ON IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION RATES: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Perkins, E. M.
    Federspiel, J.
    Bhattacharya, D.
    de los Reyes, S.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 139
  • [5] Emergency intrauterine device insertion in teenagers: an informal retrospective study
    Akintomide, Hannat
    Vinayagam, Suganthi
    Schuenmann, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2014, 40 (03): : 196 - 199
  • [6] US ADOLESCENT EXPERIENCE WITH INTRAUTERINE DEVICE INSERTION AND USE: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Bayer, L.
    Jensen, J.
    Nichols, M.
    Bednarek, P. H.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (02) : 195 - 195
  • [7] Evidence of intrauterine device insertion by nurses in Primary Health Care: an integrative review
    de Oliveira, Lays Souza
    Hermida, Patricia Madalena Vieira
    Siqueira, Elizimara Ferreira
    Arma, Juliana Cipriano Braga Silva de
    Thomas, Larissa Scheeren
    Dalmolin, Indiara Sartori
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 77 (01)
  • [8] Post-placental Intrauterine Device Insertion Versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion: An Observational Study
    Nadia Khurshid
    Shehnaz Taing
    Ambreen Qureshi
    Insha Jan Khanyari
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2020, 70 : 145 - 151
  • [9] Post-placental Intrauterine Device Insertion Versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion: An Observational Study
    Khurshid, Nadia
    Taing, Shehnaz
    Qureshi, Ambreen
    Khanyari, Insha Jan
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2020, 70 (02): : 145 - 151
  • [10] Regional variation of care dependency after hip fracture in Germany: A retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims data
    Schulz, Claudia
    Buechele, Gisela
    Peter, Raphael Simon
    Rothenbacher, Dietrich
    Roigk, Patrick
    Rapp, Kilian
    Reber, Katrin Christiane
    Koenig, Hans-Helmut
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):