Probabilistic analysis of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques: a comparative study

被引:0
|
作者
Mustafa R. [1 ]
Ahmad M.T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Katihar Engineering College Katihar, Bihar, Katihar
[2] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Katihar Engineering College Katihar, Bihar, Katihar
关键词
ANN; Central deflection; FOSM; GPR; RRM; William’s plot;
D O I
10.1007/s42107-024-01020-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Large deflection of a simply supported beam (SSB) carrying central point load is a well-known area in mechanics that has been researched extensively by numerous scholars. Various techniques, including the finite element approach and analytical exact solutions, have been implemented. Few researchers also used machine learning (ML) technique to predict deflection of SSB. This study offers ML based prediction method for deflection of SSB carrying point load and compares the applicability and adaptability of ridge regression model, artificial neural network and Gaussian process regression (GPR) in the reliability investigation of SSB. The central point load (W), beam length (L), beam width (B), beam depth (D), and concrete’s modulus of elasticity (E) are the five key input parameters that these three machine learning models take into consideration when applying them to 200 datasets in order to predict the beam deflection (∆) at the centre of the beam. The effectiveness of the well-established ML models is evaluated using a variety of performance metrics, such as coefficient of determination (R2), variance account factor, A-10 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error and mean absolute deviation. Based on performance parameters, the findings indicate that, out of the three suggested machine learning models, GPR had the best predictive performance. This was attributed to its maximum R2 = 1.000 and the lowest RMSE = 1.157E-06 during the training phase, as well as R2 = 0.999 and RMSE = 0.006 during the testing phase. Rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression plot, William’s plot, and error matrix plot are further tools used to assess the performance of the model. First-order second moment (FOSM) approach is used to determine the reliability index (β) of the model and compared with the actual value. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out to determine the impact of each input parameter on the result. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:3915 / 3928
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of central deflection and slenderness limit for lateral stability of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques
    Rashid Mustafa
    Md Talib Ahmad
    Akash Kumar
    Sonu Kumar
    Navin Kumar Sah
    Abhishek Kumar
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024, 25 (7) : 5443 - 5466
  • [2] Comparative study on sentimental analysis using machine learning techniques
    Enduri, Murali Krishna
    Sangi, Abdur Rashid
    Anamalamudi, Satish
    Manikanta, R. Chandu Badrinath
    Reddy, K. Yogeshvar
    Yeswanth, P. Lovely
    Reddy, S. Kiran Sai
    Karthikeya, Asish
    MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 42 (01) : 207 - 215
  • [3] Modal Test Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Simply Supported Beam Bridge
    Qi, Shi
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTS & INTELLIGENT SYSTEM (ICRIS 2018), 2018, : 86 - 89
  • [4] Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques in Sentimental Analysis
    Bhavitha, B. K.
    Rodrigues, Anisha P.
    Chiplunkar, Niranjan N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICICCT), 2017, : 216 - 221
  • [5] Optimization of a Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beam.
    Paczkowski, Wlodzimierz
    Archiwum Inzynierii Ladowej, 1976, 22 (04): : 559 - 569
  • [6] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Sentiment Analysis
    Jain, Kruttika
    Kaushal, Shivani
    2018 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, INFOCOM TECHNOLOGIES AND OPTIMIZATION (TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS) (ICRITO) (ICRITO), 2018, : 483 - 487
  • [7] Vibration Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Simply Supported Beam versus Variation Temperature
    Liu, Hanbing
    Wang, Hua
    Tan, Guojin
    Liu, Ziyu
    Cheng, Yongchun
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2017, 2017
  • [8] Study the effective width of steel and concrete composite truss simply supported beam
    Wang, Jun-Li
    Li, Tian
    Su, Ying-Qiang
    Zhu, Qing-Pu
    Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012, 44 (SUPPL.1): : 81 - 84
  • [9] Study on flexural capacity of simply supported steel-concrete composite beam
    Liu, Jing
    Ding, Fa-xing
    Liu, Xue-mei
    Yu, Zhi-wu
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2016, 21 (04): : 829 - 847
  • [10] A comparative analysis of data sets using Machine Learning techniques
    Abhilash, C.B.
    Rohitaksha, K.
    Biradar, Shankar
    Souvenir of the 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, IACC 2014, 2014, : 24 - 29