Prediction of central deflection and slenderness limit for lateral stability of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Rashid Mustafa [1 ]
Md Talib Ahmad [2 ]
Akash Kumar [1 ]
Sonu Kumar [1 ]
Navin Kumar Sah [1 ]
Abhishek Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Katihar Engineering College Katihar,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Katihar Engineering College Katihar,Department of Computer Science and Engineering
关键词
Central deflection; Slenderness limit; XGBoost; SVR; PR;
D O I
10.1007/s42107-024-01122-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the field of mechanics, large deflection of simply supported beam (SSB) carrying a load intensity (w) is well-known topic that has been thoroughly studied by many researchers. Numerous methods have been used, such as the analytical precise solution and the finite element approach. A small number of researchers computed central deflection of SSB having uniformly distributed load and also checked the slenderness limit for lateral stability (Ls) of SSB using numerous machine learning (ML) techniques. This study compares the suitability and flexibility of the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector regression (SVR) and polynomial regression (PR) model in the reliability investigation of SSB. It also provides an ML-based prediction method for δ and checks the slenderness limit for Ls of SSB. These three ML models apply to 400 datasets and predict the δ and as well as checks the slenderness limit for Ls of SSB by taking account five major input parameters such as beam width (b), beam depth (h), beam length (L), uniformly distributed load (w) and characteristics compressive strength of concrete (fck). Numerous performance indicators, including coefficient of determination (R2), variance account factor (VAF), a-20 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute deviation (MAD) are used to assess the efficacy of the well-established ML models. PR model achieved the best performance according to the performance metrics. This was attributed to its maximum R2 = 0.999 and 1.000 and the lowest RMSE = 0.003 and 0 during the training phase, as well as R2 = 0.994 and 1 and RMSE = 0.017 and 0 during the testing phase, while predicting central deflection (δ) and slenderness limit (Ls) of SSB respectively. The reliability index (β) was calculated using the first-order second moment (FOSM) method for all models. Rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression curve, William’s plot, Taylor diagram and error matrix plot are further tools used to assess the performance of the proposed model. First-order second moment (FOSM) approach is used to determine the reliability index (β) of the model and compared with the actual value. To check the influence of each input parameters, sensitivity analysis is performed for both the cases.
引用
收藏
页码:5443 / 5466
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Probabilistic analysis of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques: a comparative study
    Mustafa R.
    Ahmad M.T.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024, 25 (5) : 3915 - 3928
  • [2] Prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques
    Gupta, Tanuja
    Rao, Meesala Chakradhara
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2022, 23 (05) : 3073 - 3090
  • [3] An insight into the prediction of mechanical properties of concrete using machine learning techniques
    Shukla, Neeraj Kumar
    Garg, Aman
    Bhutto, Javed
    Aggarwal, Mona
    Raja, M. Ramkumar
    Hussein, Hany S.
    Khan, T. M. Yunus
    Sabherwal, Pooja
    COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2023, 32 (03): : 263 - 286
  • [4] Enhanced slope stability prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques
    Yadav, Devendra Kumar
    Chattopadhyay, Swarup
    Tripathy, Debi Prasad
    Mishra, Pragyan
    Singh, Pritiranjan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [5] Splitting tensile strength prediction of Metakaolin concrete using machine learning techniques
    Li, Qiang
    Ren, Guoqi
    Wang, Haoran
    Xu, Qikeng
    Zhao, Jinquan
    Wang, Huifen
    Ding, Yonggang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [6] Splitting tensile strength prediction of Metakaolin concrete using machine learning techniques
    Qiang Li
    Guoqi Ren
    Haoran Wang
    Qikeng Xu
    Jinquan Zhao
    Huifen Wang
    Yonggang Ding
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [7] Compressive strength prediction of fly ash concrete by using machine learning techniques
    Suhaila Khursheed
    J. Jagan
    Pijush Samui
    Sanjay Kumar
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2021, 6
  • [8] Compressive Strength Prediction of Fly Ash Concrete Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Jiang, Yimin
    Li, Hangyu
    Zhou, Yisong
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (05)
  • [9] Compressive strength prediction of fly ash concrete by using machine learning techniques
    Khursheed, Suhaila
    Jagan, J.
    Samui, Pijush
    Kumar, Sanjay
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2021, 6 (03)
  • [10] Prediction of Strength and Failure Modes in Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints using Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques
    Saha, Prasenjit
    Sapkota, Sanjog Chhetri
    Das, Sourav
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2024,