Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Leyao [1 ]
Feng, Bing [1 ]
Liang, Meng [1 ]
Li, Dengfeng [1 ]
Cong, Rong [1 ]
Chen, Zhaowei [1 ]
Wang, Sicong [2 ]
Ma, Xiaohong [1 ]
Zhao, Xinming [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr,Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Magnet Resonance Imaging Res Gen Elect Healthcare, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
关键词
Alpha-fetoprotein; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prognosis; Nomogram; ALBUMIN-BILIRUBIN ALBI; MICROVASCULAR INVASION; RECURRENCE; HEPATECTOMY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04278-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the role of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors for predicting the prognosis of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative (<= 20 ng/ml) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, and to compare with other traditional staging systems. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 169 patients with AFP-negative HCC who received preoperative MRI and hepatectomy between January 2015 and August 2020 (derivation dataset:validation dataset = 118:51). A prognostic model was constructed using the risk factors identified via Cox regression analysis. Predictive performance and discrimination capability were evaluated and compared with those of two traditional staging systems. Results Six risk factors, namely the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade, were associated with recurrence-free survival. The prognostic model constructed using these factors achieved C-index of 0.705 and 0.674 in the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Furthermore, the model performed better in predicting patient prognosis than traditional staging systems. The model effectively stratified patients with AFP-negative HCC into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion A prognostic model integrating the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade may serve as a valuable tool for refining risk stratification in patients with AFP-negative HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1918 / 1928
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging in LI-RADS version 2018: a strategy to improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Seung-seob
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Bae, Heejin
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 1620 - 1629
  • [32] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Primary Liver Cancer in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis on Enhanced MRI
    Liu, Xinai
    Ni, Xiaoyan
    Li, Yubo
    Yang, Chun
    Wang, Yi
    Ma, Chunzheng
    Zhou, Changwu
    Lu, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [33] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [34] Man or machine? Prospective comparison of the version 2018 EASL, LI-RADS criteria and a radiomics model to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Liu, Xijiao
    Chen, Jie
    Wei, Yi
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Cao, Likun
    Wu, Yuanan
    Duan, Ting
    Li, Xin
    Ma, Ling
    Song, Bin
    CANCER IMAGING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [35] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10–19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Sidong Xie
    Yao Zhang
    Jingbiao Chen
    Ting Jiang
    Weimin Liu
    Dailin Rong
    Lin Sun
    Linqi Zhang
    Bingjun He
    Jin Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 596 - 607
  • [36] Man or machine? Prospective comparison of the version 2018 EASL, LI-RADS criteria and a radiomics model to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hanyu Jiang
    Xijiao Liu
    Jie Chen
    Yi Wei
    Jeong Min Lee
    Likun Cao
    Yuanan Wu
    Ting Duan
    Xin Li
    Ling Ma
    Bin Song
    Cancer Imaging, 19
  • [37] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Do, Richard K.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Tang, An
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 816 - 830
  • [38] Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study
    Rong, Dailin
    He, Bingjun
    Tang, Wenjie
    Xie, Sidong
    Kuang, Sichi
    Grazioli, Luigi
    Hussain, Shahid M.
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Jin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 687 - 698
  • [39] Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other hepatic malignancies in patients with hepatitis B virus infection
    Shao, Shuo
    Liang, Yingying
    Kuang, Sichi
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Shan, Qungang
    Yang, Hao
    Zhang, Yao
    Wang, Bin
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Wang, Jin
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (03) : 401 - 410
  • [40] Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 on CT for Determining Eligibility for Liver Transplant According to Milan Criteria in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kyoung Bun
    Kim, Haeryoung
    Han, Joon Koo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (01) : 86 - 96