Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Leyao [1 ]
Feng, Bing [1 ]
Liang, Meng [1 ]
Li, Dengfeng [1 ]
Cong, Rong [1 ]
Chen, Zhaowei [1 ]
Wang, Sicong [2 ]
Ma, Xiaohong [1 ]
Zhao, Xinming [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr,Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Magnet Resonance Imaging Res Gen Elect Healthcare, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
关键词
Alpha-fetoprotein; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prognosis; Nomogram; ALBUMIN-BILIRUBIN ALBI; MICROVASCULAR INVASION; RECURRENCE; HEPATECTOMY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04278-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the role of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors for predicting the prognosis of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative (<= 20 ng/ml) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, and to compare with other traditional staging systems. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 169 patients with AFP-negative HCC who received preoperative MRI and hepatectomy between January 2015 and August 2020 (derivation dataset:validation dataset = 118:51). A prognostic model was constructed using the risk factors identified via Cox regression analysis. Predictive performance and discrimination capability were evaluated and compared with those of two traditional staging systems. Results Six risk factors, namely the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade, were associated with recurrence-free survival. The prognostic model constructed using these factors achieved C-index of 0.705 and 0.674 in the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Furthermore, the model performed better in predicting patient prognosis than traditional staging systems. The model effectively stratified patients with AFP-negative HCC into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion A prognostic model integrating the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade may serve as a valuable tool for refining risk stratification in patients with AFP-negative HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1918 / 1928
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MRI-Based Radiomics Models to Discriminate Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LR-M According to LI-RADS Version 2018
    Zhang, Haiping
    Guo, Dajing
    Liu, Huan
    He, Xiaojing
    Qiao, Xiaofeng
    Liu, Xinjie
    Liu, Yangyang
    Zhou, Jun
    Zhou, Zhiming
    Liu, Xi
    Fang, Zheng
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (05)
  • [22] Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of LR-5 in LI-RADS Version 2018 versus Revised LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis
    Goins, Stacy M.
    Jiang, Hanyu
    van der Pol, Christian B.
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Lam, Eric
    Adamo, Robert G.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Costa, Andreu F.
    Tang, An
    Alhasan, Ayman S.
    Allen, Brian C.
    Reiner, Caecilia S.
    Clarke, Christopher
    Cerny, Milena
    Wang, Jin
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Song, Bin
    Joo, Ijin
    Kang, Zhen
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kwon, Heejin
    Ronot, Maxime
    Podgorska, Joanna
    Rosiak, Grzegorz
    Song, Ji Soo
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)
  • [23] Risk stratification of LI-RADS M and LI-RADS 4/5 combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic values of MR imaging features and clinicopathological factors
    Yi Wang
    Gui-Qi Zhu
    Chang-Wu Zhou
    Na Li
    Chun Yang
    Meng-Su Zeng
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 5166 - 5178
  • [24] Risk stratification of LI-RADS M and LI-RADS 4/5 combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic values of MR imaging features and clinicopathological factors
    Wang, Yi
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Zhou, Chang-Wu
    Li, Na
    Yang, Chun
    Zeng, Meng-Su
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (08) : 5166 - 5178
  • [25] Extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging in LI-RADS version 2018: a strategy to improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate disodium–enhanced MRI
    Seung-seob Kim
    Sunyoung Lee
    Heejin Bae
    Yong Eun Chung
    Jin-Young Choi
    Mi-Suk Park
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 1620 - 1629
  • [26] LI-RADS Major Features on MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Yoon, Ja Kyung
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (02) : 518 - 525
  • [27] LI-RADS version 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Se Jin Choi
    Won-Mook Choi
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 5792 - 5800
  • [28] LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features
    Wang, Di
    Zhang, Yang
    Lyu, Rong
    Jia, Kefeng
    Xu, Peng-Ju
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (09) : 3045 - 3055
  • [29] Preoperative Nomogram Incorporating Clinical Factors, Serological Markers and LI-RADS MRI Features to Predict Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization
    Sheng, Ye
    Wang, Qing
    Liu, Hai-Feng
    Chen, Wen-Hua
    He, Zhong-Ming
    Wang, Qi
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 1288 - 1297
  • [30] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI
    Park, Sungeun
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Kim, Se Woo
    Lee, Jeong Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (03) : 554 - 561