Advantages and limitations of propensity score methods to analyze non-randomized clinical trials

被引:1
|
作者
Gayat, E. [1 ,2 ]
Porcher, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, U717, F-75010 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Epidemiol Clin & Biostat, UMR S717, F-75010 Paris, France
[3] Hop St Louis, Dept Biostat & Informat Med, F-75010 Paris, France
来源
REANIMATION | 2012年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
Propensity score; Propensity; Matching; Methodology; Intensive Care;
D O I
10.1007/s13546-011-0422-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The propensity score (PS), defined as a patient's probability of receiving a specific treatment conditional on the observed covariates, is a method that leads to control the bias associated with the non-randomly assigned treatment allocation in observational studies. PS methods have been increasingly used in the last 10 years. The quality of reporting PS in the intensive care medicine literature should be improved. This review aims to present the theory of PS, illustrated with an example and provides recommendations to the investigators in order to improve the reporting of PS analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIMITATIONS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS TO RECOGNIZE POSSIBLE ADVANTAGES OF COMBINATION THERAPIES IN RHEUMATIC DISEASES
    PINCUS, T
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1993, 23 (02) : 2 - 10
  • [22] Benchmarking Observational Analyses Against Randomized Trials: a Review of Studies Assessing Propensity Score Methods
    Shaun P. Forbes
    Issa J. Dahabreh
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 1396 - 1404
  • [23] Benchmarking Observational Analyses Against Randomized Trials: a Review of Studies Assessing Propensity Score Methods
    Forbes, Shaun P.
    Dahabreh, Issa J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (05) : 1396 - 1404
  • [24] PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING DOES NOT ALWAYS REMOVE CONFOUNDING WITHIN AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION BASED ON A NON-RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Guertin, J. R.
    Bowen, J. M.
    O'Reilly, D.
    Tarride, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A338 - A338
  • [25] Patients' knowledge about their involvement in clinical trials. A non-randomized controlled trial
    Juan-Salvadores, Pablo
    Michel Gomez, Marcela Sanchez
    Jimenez Diaz, Victor Alfonso
    Martinez Reglero, Cristina
    Iniguez Romo, Andres
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [26] Can propensity score analyses be alternatives to randomized trials.
    Ishizuka, Naoki
    Yamanaka, Takeharu
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 12 (11)
  • [27] Radiotherapy in Leptomeningeal Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-randomized Trials
    Buszek, Samantha M.
    Chung, Caroline
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [28] Bedside methods for transpyloric feeding tube insertion in hospitalized children: A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized trials
    Hawk, Heather
    Valdivia, Hector
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2021, 60 : 238 - 246
  • [29] Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitations
    Wang, JX
    Donnan, PT
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 10 (04) : 341 - 344
  • [30] Clinical Benefit of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Epilepsy: Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Non-Randomized Studies
    Cramer, Samuel W.
    McGovern, Robert A.
    Chen, Clark C.
    Park, Michael C.
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE, 2023, 15