Agreeing on Role Adoption in Open Organisations

被引:4
|
作者
Aldewereld, Huib [1 ]
Dignum, Virginia [1 ]
Jonker, Catholijn M. [2 ]
van Riemsdijk, M. Birna [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, ICT Sect, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Man Machine Interact, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Man Machine Interact Grp, Delft, Netherlands
来源
KUNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ | 2012年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Agent programming; Organizational modeling; Role enactment;
D O I
10.1007/s13218-011-0152-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The organisational specification of a multi-agent system supports agents' effectiveness in attaining their purpose, or prevent certain undesired behaviour from occurring. This requires that agents are able to find out about the organisational purpose and description and decide on its appropriateness for their own objectives. Organisational modeling languages are used to specify an agent system in terms of its roles, organizational structure, norms, etc. Agents take part in organisations by playing one or more of the specified roles for which they have the necessary capabilities. In this paper, we investigate the process of role adoption in the context of the well-known OperA organisational modelling language. In OperA, each organisation has a gatekeeper role responsible for admitting agents to the organisation. Agents playing the role of gatekeeper can interact with agents that want to enter the organisation in order to come to agreement on role adoption. That is, negotiate which roles they will play and under which conditions they will play them. This is possible by evaluating capability requirements for roles. We extend OperA to allow for the specification of role capabilities. This approach will be illustrated using the Blocks World for Teams (BW4T) domain.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of Voluntary Organisations
    Epstein, Joyce
    CURRENT PEDIATRIC REVIEWS, 2010, 6 (01) : 82 - 85
  • [22] THE CASE FOR OPEN ADOPTION
    WATSON, KW
    PUBLIC WELFARE, 1988, 46 (04): : 24 - 28
  • [23] CONCEPT OF OPEN ADOPTION
    BARAN, A
    PANNOR, R
    SOROSKY, AD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 1975, 45 (02) : 196 - 197
  • [24] The spirit of open adoption
    Feigelman, W
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE FAMILY STUDIES, 1998, 29 (03) : 599 - 600
  • [25] Open Adoption and Adolescence
    Siegel, Deborah H.
    FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES, 2008, 89 (03): : 366 - 374
  • [26] Pre-adoption adversities and adoptees' outcomes: The protective role of post-adoption variables in an Italian experience of domestic open adoption
    Balenzano, Caterina
    Coppol, Gabrielle
    Cassibba, Rosalinda
    Moro, Giuseppe
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2018, 85 : 307 - 318
  • [27] Initial Validation of the Open Adoption Scale: Measuring the Influence of Adoption Myths on Attitudes Toward Open Adoption
    Brown, Donna
    Ryan, Scott
    Pushkal, Janet
    ADOPTION QUARTERLY, 2007, 10 (3-4) : 179 - 196
  • [28] A study of the environmental management system (EMS) adoption process within Australasian organisations - 2. Role of stakeholders
    Zutshi, A
    Sohal, A
    TECHNOVATION, 2004, 24 (05) : 371 - 386
  • [29] Measuring Attitudes toward Open Adoption: Spanish Validation of the Open Adoption Scale
    Berastegui, Ana
    Oliver, Jesus
    Corral, Susana
    Perez-Testor, Carles
    Calvo, Irene
    Lorente-De-Sanz, Judith
    Sanz, Mireia
    Ryan, Scott D.
    ANUARIO DE PSICOLOGIA JURIDICA, 2025, 35 (01):
  • [30] Understanding the determinants of Cloud Computing adoption in Saudi healthcare organisations
    Fawaz Alharbi
    Anthony Atkins
    Clare Stanier
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2016, 2 (3) : 155 - 171